Compare Hygraph and Sanity 
- Users report that Hygraph excels in content authoring with a score of 8.7, while Sanity shines even brighter with a score of 9.1, indicating a more user-friendly interface and better tools for creating and managing content.
- Reviewers mention that Hygraph's versioning feature scores 8.1, which is lower than Sanity's 8.7, suggesting that users find Sanity's version control more robust and reliable for tracking changes over time.
- G2 users highlight that Hygraph offers superior personalization capabilities with a score of 8.0 compared to Sanity's 8.9, indicating that Sanity provides more advanced options for tailoring content to specific audiences.
- Users on G2 report that Hygraph's API / Integrations score of 8.6 is slightly lower than Sanity's 8.9, suggesting that Sanity may offer more seamless integration options with other tools and platforms.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms have strong ease of admin scores of 9.0, but users report that Hygraph's overall support quality is rated higher at 9.0 compared to Sanity's 8.9, indicating a more responsive support experience.
- Users say that Hygraph's customization options are rated at 8.3, while Sanity stands out with a score of 9.2, suggesting that Sanity provides more flexibility for tailoring the platform to meet specific business needs.
- Fully Hosted and GraphQL native Headless CMS
- Robust GraphQL Content APIs for read and write access
- Built in Digital Asset Management with Assets Transformation API
- 20 user seats included
- 2 datasets (public)
- Unlimited content types and locales
Hygraph was a breeze to setup - From the setup via the dashboard of configuring your schema and creating content it was extreme straightforward. It was easy enough to actually co-configure this with our client live. The developer experience is also...
There was a bit of a learning curve on how to best use the tool. A lot of the content is siloed and then you have to piece it all together which is challenging at first, but then once you have a lot of content it actually makes it easier to reuse and put...
With their templates to launch sites via Netlify, they make it really easy to get up and running with sites that get you started. Really low barrier to entry. I also like that they are not committed to just one technology - they even have a Sapper blog...
I dislike the lack of different environments - we have those implemented as different datasets, but that means that we can on accident change data in the wrong dataset because we are connected to the only environment that exists. I dislike the low...
Hygraph was a breeze to setup - From the setup via the dashboard of configuring your schema and creating content it was extreme straightforward. It was easy enough to actually co-configure this with our client live. The developer experience is also...
With their templates to launch sites via Netlify, they make it really easy to get up and running with sites that get you started. Really low barrier to entry. I also like that they are not committed to just one technology - they even have a Sapper blog...
There was a bit of a learning curve on how to best use the tool. A lot of the content is siloed and then you have to piece it all together which is challenging at first, but then once you have a lot of content it actually makes it easier to reuse and put...
I dislike the lack of different environments - we have those implemented as different datasets, but that means that we can on accident change data in the wrong dataset because we are connected to the only environment that exists. I dislike the low...
