Google Artifact Registry vs Sonatype Nexus Repository
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Sonatype Nexus Repository easier to use and do business with overall. However, reviewers preferred the ease of set up with Google Artifact Registry, along with administration.
Reviewers felt that Sonatype Nexus Repository meets the needs of their business better than Google Artifact Registry.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Google Artifact Registry is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Google Artifact Registry over Sonatype Nexus Repository.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Google Artifact Registry
No pricing available
Sonatype Nexus Repository
No pricing available
Free Trial
Google Artifact Registry
No trial information available
Sonatype Nexus Repository
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
21
9.2
17
Ease of Use
8.5
21
8.7
17
Ease of Setup
8.9
9
8.3
8
Ease of Admin
9.1
9
8.8
8
Quality of Support
8.7
21
8.3
13
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Nexus Repository Manager helps store application files. It is similar to Github, but is accessible on the company's intranet, rather than on the internet,...Read more
Sonatype Nexus Repository has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.