Best Software for 2025 is now live!

Compare GMass and Woodpecker.co

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
GMass
GMass
Star Rating
(1,156)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (85.8% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GMass
Woodpecker.co
Woodpecker.co
Star Rating
(83)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (71.3% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $29.00 500 prospects contacted Per Month
Learn more about Woodpecker.co
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Woodpecker.co excels in "Lead Follow-up" with a perfect score of 10.0, indicating that it provides exceptional tools for managing follow-ups, while GMass, although strong, has a lower score of 8.1 in "Lead Qualification," suggesting it may not be as robust in this area.
  • Reviewers mention that GMass shines in "Email Scheduling" with a score of 9.3, making it easier for users to plan their email campaigns effectively, whereas Woodpecker.co scores slightly lower at 8.8, which may impact users looking for advanced scheduling features.
  • G2 users highlight that GMass has superior "Email Tracking/Automation" capabilities with a score of 9.2, allowing for better monitoring of email performance, while Woodpecker.co's score of 9.2 in the same category indicates it is competitive but may lack some advanced features that GMass offers.
  • Users on G2 report that Woodpecker.co's "Opportunity and Pipeline Management" is rated a perfect 10.0, showcasing its strength in managing sales opportunities, while GMass does not have a comparable feature, which may be a drawback for users focused on sales processes.
  • Reviewers mention that GMass provides better "Email and Mobile Preview" functionality with a score of 9.0, which is crucial for ensuring emails look good on all devices, while Woodpecker.co's score in this area is not specified, indicating potential limitations.
  • Users say that GMass has a higher overall G2 rating of 4.8 compared to Woodpecker.co's 4.3, suggesting that GMass is generally viewed more favorably by users, which could influence a buyer's decision based on user satisfaction.
Featured Products
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GMass
No pricing available
Woodpecker.co
Woodpecker Cold Email
Starting at $29.00
500 prospects contacted Per Month
Learn more about Woodpecker.co
Free Trial
GMass
No trial information available
Woodpecker.co
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.5
810
8.5
70
Ease of Use
9.3
830
8.9
73
Ease of Setup
9.3
341
8.9
48
Ease of Admin
9.3
251
8.6
28
Quality of Support
9.2
699
8.4
69
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
236
8.5
28
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
747
8.8
67
Features by Category
8.8
5,837
Not enough data
Email Marketing
9.0
391
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.1
436
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.1
460
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.2
451
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.4
457
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.1
444
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
382
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
270
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
251
|
Verified
Not enough data
Reporting & Analytics
8.5
279
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
409
|
Verified
Not enough data
Platform
8.9
226
|
Verified
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.2
260
|
Verified
Not enough data
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Integration
9.1
239
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
196
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
184
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
169
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
168
Not enough data
8.3
165
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.4
74
Lead Facilitation
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
10.0
7
Not enough data
9.2
6
Organization
Not enough data
10.0
6
Not enough data
10.0
6
Not enough data
10.0
6
Performance Analysis
Not enough data
10.0
6
Not enough data
10.0
6
Sales Analysis
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Generative AI
Not enough data
10.0
6
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.4
457
Integrated Workflows
Not enough data
7.6
28
Not enough data
9.4
29
Not enough data
5.5
25
Not enough data
6.5
26
Not enough data
7.4
27
Not enough data
7.0
26
Not enough data
6.9
26
Repeatability and Reportability
Not enough data
7.9
26
Not enough data
8.3
28
Not enough data
8.7
27
Not enough data
8.0
27
Not enough data
6.5
26
AI and Automation
Not enough data
7.3
27
Not enough data
7.6
28
Not enough data
8.6
28
Not enough data
6.3
27
Not enough data
6.7
26
Generative AI
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
9.0
2,183
8.4
326
Analytics
8.9
305
8.5
49
8.8
289
8.0
45
8.9
250
Feature Not Available
Customizations
9.2
275
8.6
45
9.3
288
8.9
50
9.1
282
8.3
46
9.0
255
8.2
47
8.8
239
8.6
44
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GMass
GMass
Woodpecker.co
Woodpecker.co
GMass and Woodpecker.co are categorized as Email Tracking
Unique Categories
GMass
GMass is categorized as Email Marketing
Woodpecker.co
Woodpecker.co is categorized as Sales Engagement and AI Sales Assistant
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GMass
GMass
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
85.8%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
11.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
2.8%
Woodpecker.co
Woodpecker.co
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
71.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
21.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
7.5%
Reviewers' Industry
GMass
GMass
Marketing and Advertising
18.8%
Information Technology and Services
5.6%
Real Estate
4.0%
Computer Software
3.9%
Financial Services
3.3%
Other
64.4%
Woodpecker.co
Woodpecker.co
Marketing and Advertising
27.5%
Information Technology and Services
17.5%
Computer Software
13.8%
Consulting
6.3%
Internet
5.0%
Other
30.0%
Most Helpful Reviews
GMass
GMass
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Nisha C.
NC
Nisha C.
Verified User in Import and Export

I have recently subscribed to GMass and I'm very impressed by its set of tools. Having used Sendinblue just before this, I can compare the differences and can tell GMass surely is a superior tool for email campaigns for people looking for higher...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Ranjana T.
RT
Ranjana T.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services

It's not that easy to use. Once you grow and have the money to spend, it makes more sense to opt for a different sales fulfilment tool such as a Mixmax or a Yesware or Persistiq. I think what I find hardest with Gmass is that since it's from within Gmail,...

Woodpecker.co
Woodpecker.co
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Paweł K.
PK
Paweł K.
Verified User in Consulting

The client management dashboard alone is the easiest in the industry. This year, they are also introducing many simplifications and solutions tailored to the changing outbound marketing market.

Most Helpful Critical Review
Cameron A B.
CB
Cameron A B.
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising

I dislike the disconnect between sales reps, customer service and their no refund policy. I contacted sales asking questions they were a answered with summation that Woodpecker could provide me with I'm searching for. I'm Based on this I made...

Alternatives
GMass
GMass Alternatives
Saleshandy
Saleshandy
Add Saleshandy
Brevo Marketing Platform
Brevo Marketing Platform
Add Brevo Marketing Platform
Intuit Mailchimp Email Marketing
Intuit Mailchimp Email Marketing
Add Intuit Mailchimp Email Marketing
Mixmax
Mixmax
Add Mixmax
Woodpecker.co
Woodpecker.co Alternatives
Reply
Reply
Add Reply
Outreach
Outreach
Add Outreach
Saleshandy
Saleshandy
Add Saleshandy
Klenty
klenty
Add Klenty
Discussions
GMass
GMass Discussions
Is GMass a Google product?
3 comments
Is there a way to learn how to use GMass?
2 comments
JQR M.
JM
its very easy to mange business i like to use it Thanks Gmas Read more
Can it be integrated with ClickFunnels and use with a Chatbot
1 comment
Steve K.
SK
G2 has great API's to assist you in achieving these goals. You should determine which API's meet your needs. Read more
Woodpecker.co
Woodpecker.co Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Woodpecker.co has no discussions with answers