Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitLab and Red Hat Quay 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.4% of reviews)
Mid-Market (49.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
GitLab
Star Rating
(864)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLabRed Hat Quay
Star Rating
(50)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (49.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Red Hat QuayGitLab vs Red Hat Quay
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Red Hat Quay easier to use. However, GitLab is easier to set up and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with GitLab overall.
- Reviewers felt that GitLab meets the needs of their business better than Red Hat Quay.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, GitLab and Red Hat Quay provide similar levels of assistance.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Red Hat Quay over GitLab.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitLab
No pricing availableRed Hat Quay
No pricing availableFree Trial
GitLab
Free Trial is available
Red Hat Quay
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
654
8.7
46
Ease of Use
8.7
656
8.9
46
Ease of Setup
8.6
217
7.1
7
Ease of Admin
8.6
172
7.0
5
Quality of Support
8.5
518
8.5
44
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
147
7.0
5
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
621
10.0
47
Features by Category
Administration
8.7
123
Not enough data
8.9
131
Not enough data
8.6
123
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
129
Not enough data
8.5
115
Not enough data
8.5
109
Not enough data
8.7
114
Not enough data
8.6
103
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
132
Not enough data
9.0
121
Not enough data
8.7
121
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
28
Not enough data
9.0
27
Not enough data
Analysis
8.7
26
Not enough data
9.0
27
Not enough data
9.1
27
Not enough data
8.9
25
Not enough data
Testing
8.8
27
Not enough data
8.7
26
Not enough data
9.1
26
Not enough data
8.8
26
Not enough data
8.8
24
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
8.8
24
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
25
Not enough data
8.9
24
Not enough data
Analysis
8.5
24
Not enough data
9.2
24
Not enough data
8.8
24
Not enough data
8.9
24
Not enough data
9.0
24
Not enough data
Testing
8.6
23
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.9
22
Not enough data
9.0
21
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
9.1
21
Not enough data
Administration
8.7
77
Not enough data
8.7
78
Not enough data
8.7
75
Not enough data
8.8
80
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
79
Not enough data
8.4
72
Not enough data
9.0
79
Not enough data
8.7
73
Not enough data
IT Management
8.7
74
Not enough data
8.9
74
Not enough data
8.6
71
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
213
Not enough data
9.0
215
Not enough data
8.7
205
Not enough data
Management
8.8
199
Not enough data
8.4
191
Not enough data
8.9
207
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.6
139
Not enough data
8.5
133
Not enough data
8.6
140
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.4
136
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.8
135
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
65
Not enough data
8.8
70
Not enough data
8.7
67
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
64
Not enough data
9.0
64
Not enough data
9.0
61
Not enough data
Management
8.8
142
Not enough data
8.8
147
Not enough data
8.5
135
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
148
Not enough data
8.8
148
Not enough data
8.7
139
Not enough data
Processes
9.0
152
Not enough data
8.5
140
Not enough data
9.0
155
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
226
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
210
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
204
|
Verified
Not enough data
Management
8.9
214
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
215
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
197
|
Verified
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
7.3
11
Not enough data
7.6
13
Not enough data
7.4
12
Not enough data
7.1
11
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
116
Not enough data
8.6
112
Not enough data
8.4
112
Not enough data
Security
8.0
101
Not enough data
8.4
100
Not enough data
9.0
109
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Analysis
8.9
39
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.9
37
Not enough data
Value Management
9.0
39
Not enough data
8.7
41
Not enough data
8.9
40
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitLab and Red Hat Quay share no categories
Unique Categories
GitLab is categorized as Secure Code Review, DevOps Platforms, Value Stream Management, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Bug Tracking, Continuous Integration, and AI Code Generation
Red Hat Quay is categorized as Container Registry
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Red Hat Quay
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.6%
Information Technology and Services
24.1%
Internet
3.9%
Financial Services
3.4%
Telecommunications
2.2%
Other
32.7%
Information Technology and Services
49.0%
Telecommunications
8.2%
Computer Software
6.1%
Public Relations and Communications
4.1%
Human Resources
4.1%
Other
28.6%
Alternatives
Discussions
Is GitLab paid?
5 Comments
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 Comments
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
Red Hat Quay has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
