Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Fable and accessiBe 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
All in One Accessibility
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Accessible Web RAMP
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Equally.ai
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.7% of reviews)
Small-Business (75.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $4,500.00 1 project With One-Time Purchase
$490.00 Per Year
Fable
Star Rating
(15)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $4,500.00 1 project With One-Time Purchase
Browse all 2 pricing plansaccessiBe
Star Rating
(1,508)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (75.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$490.00 Per Year
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that accessiBe excels in user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher overall score compared to Fable. Users appreciate its easy implementation and affordability, with one reviewer noting it as a "one-stop place" for maintaining website accessibility without needing extensive knowledge.
- Users say that accessiBe's setup process is straightforward, with many highlighting the intuitive onboarding experience. In contrast, Fable, while praised for its quality, has fewer recent reviews, which may indicate a less active user base or slower adoption.
- Reviewers mention that accessiBe provides excellent ongoing support, with a high quality rating that reflects its commitment to customer service. Users feel reassured knowing their accessibility needs are continuously monitored, as one user stated, "I just know that it's taken care of."
- According to verified reviews, Fable is recognized for its ability to cater to diverse user experiences and skills, making it a valuable tool for teams needing to gather feedback from various participants. However, its higher entry-level price may deter smaller businesses.
- Users highlight that accessiBe's features, such as real-time monitoring and automated testing, significantly enhance website compliance, with many finding it meets their core accessibility requirements effectively. Fable, while offering personalized demos, may not provide the same level of automated support.
- Reviewers note that while both platforms aim to improve digital accessibility, accessiBe's broader market presence and user-friendly approach make it a more appealing choice for small businesses, as evidenced by its higher percentage of reviews from this segment compared to Fable.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Fable
Fable Engage: Pay-per-project
Starting at $4,500.00
1 project With One-Time Purchase
For teams looking to start accessibility research and testing on-demand.
Expert-designed templated projects have everything you need to start collecting insights.
- Research methods: Self-guided Tasks, Compatibility Tests, User Interviews
- Audience: Screen reader, screen magnification, alternative nav users
- Video session recordings
accessiBe
Micro
$490.00
Per Year
Up to 5,000 website visits /month
- Automated scans & fixes every 24 hrs
- Accessibility report & documentation
- AI-powered screen reader & keyboard navigation
Free Trial
Fable
No trial information availableaccessiBe
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.2
13
9.6
1,036
Ease of Use
9.2
13
9.7
1,044
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
9.6
929
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
9.5
890
Quality of Support
9.3
12
9.5
952
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.6
877
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
13
9.2
956
Features by Category
Monitoring
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.3
15
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Administration
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.3
15
Standards
Not enough data
9.4
15
Not enough data
9.4
15
Not enough data
9.0
15
Not enough data
9.3
15
Agentic AI - Digital Governance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
User Response Methods
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Participant Selection
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Insights
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.6
6
9.5
479
8.5
8
9.2
429
8.8
7
9.1
415
9.1
9
Feature Not Available
Reporting
9.0
8
Feature Not Available
9.0
7
Feature Not Available
Automation
9.0
7
9.1
415
9.2
6
9.3
447
Functionality
9.2
6
Feature Not Available
8.8
8
8.9
383
9.0
8
Feature Not Available
8.8
7
9.1
377
8.8
7
9.3
400
Generative AI
Not enough data
8.7
217
Agentic AI - Digital Accessibility Platforms
Not enough data
8.4
34
Not enough data
8.6
34
Not enough data
8.7
34
Not enough data
8.5
37
Support
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Reporting
Not enough data
9.1
445
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
451
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.3
462
Generative AI
Not enough data
8.6
141
Agentic AI - Digital Accessibility Tools
Not enough data
8.1
18
Not enough data
7.9
17
Not enough data
8.3
18
Not enough data
8.1
18
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Fable and accessiBe are categorized as Digital Accessibility Platforms
Unique Categories
Fable is categorized as User Research
accessiBe is categorized as Digital Accessibility Tools and Digital Governance
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Fable
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
accessiBe
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
40.0%
Information Technology and Services
13.3%
Primary/Secondary Education
6.7%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
6.7%
Marketing and Advertising
6.7%
Other
26.7%
Marketing and Advertising
18.4%
Retail
6.7%
Non-Profit Organization Management
4.2%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
4.0%
Consumer Goods
4.0%
Other
62.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
Fable has no discussions with answers
Does the service go down often? Also how secure is it?
8 Comments
GF
I have yet to notice an outage, we've been using on 3+ sites for over 6 months, no noticeable page load delays or anything like that (and I actively monitor...Read more
Can I use it on another website for the same cost?
7 Comments
JW
No, one license is for one domain name.Read more
Is there a way internally to remove the "Web Accessibility Solution By Accessibe" link?
7 Comments
TG
yes it can be removed or customized to your own company nameRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
