Compare ERDAS IMAGINE and Google Earth Pro 
- Users report that Google Earth Pro excels in data visualization, with a score of 9.0, allowing users to create stunning visual representations of geographic data. In contrast, ERDAS IMAGINE scores only 7.5 in this area, which may limit its effectiveness for users focused on impactful presentations.
- Reviewers mention that Google Earth Pro offers superior ease of use with a score of 8.9, making it accessible for small businesses and casual users. On the other hand, ERDAS IMAGINE, with a score of 7.5, may present a steeper learning curve, particularly for those new to GIS software.
- G2 users highlight that Google Earth Pro's data capture capabilities are robust, scoring 8.8, which is essential for users needing to gather and analyze geographic information efficiently. ERDAS IMAGINE, while still strong at 8.6, may not provide the same level of user-friendly data capture tools.
- Users on G2 report that Google Earth Pro shines in map creation, particularly with its geocoding feature scoring 8.6, which simplifies the process of converting addresses into geographic coordinates. In comparison, ERDAS IMAGINE's geocoding score of 7.3 indicates it may not be as effective for users needing precise location mapping.
- Reviewers mention that ERDAS IMAGINE excels in spatial analysis, achieving a high score of 9.4, making it a preferred choice for users focused on in-depth geographic data analysis. Google Earth Pro, while still competent at 8.5, may not offer the same level of analytical depth.
- Users say that Google Earth Pro's quality of support is rated at 8.2, which is generally favorable, but ERDAS IMAGINE falls behind with a score of 7.3, indicating potential challenges for users seeking timely assistance and guidance.
the interface is very clear, new users can easily understand the software, the products generated present excellent quality. the workflow is great with the new developed tools that allow you to define the bands and the processes to be applied in the...
Time consuming to set up the semi-automated analysis.
Due to my experience as an engineer, this tool helps me a lot. Different projects need a lot of site information while you don't have the luxury of time to check it on spot hence google earth becomes the most convenient tool. It helps locate building,...
Can be slow on occasions but overall I find it impressive to use - primarily this is down to zooms when the camera pans both in and out.
the interface is very clear, new users can easily understand the software, the products generated present excellent quality. the workflow is great with the new developed tools that allow you to define the bands and the processes to be applied in the...
Due to my experience as an engineer, this tool helps me a lot. Different projects need a lot of site information while you don't have the luxury of time to check it on spot hence google earth becomes the most convenient tool. It helps locate building,...
Time consuming to set up the semi-automated analysis.
Can be slow on occasions but overall I find it impressive to use - primarily this is down to zooms when the camera pans both in and out.
