Compare Easygenerator and isEazy Author 
- Users report that Easygenerator excels in ease of use with a score of 9.6, while isEazy Author achieves a perfect score of 10.0, indicating that isEazy Author may offer a more intuitive user experience overall.
- Reviewers mention that Easygenerator's content libraries score 8.6, which is notably lower than isEazy Author's 9.7, suggesting that isEazy Author provides a more extensive and useful collection of resources for content creation.
- G2 users highlight that Easygenerator's AI text generation feature scores an impressive 9.7, showcasing its strong capabilities in generating content, while isEazy Author does not have a comparable AI text generation feature, which may limit its content creation efficiency.
- Users on G2 report that both platforms have the same score of 9.7 for ease of setup, indicating that both Easygenerator and isEazy Author are equally straightforward to implement, which is a significant advantage for new users.
- Reviewers mention that Easygenerator's customization options score 9.0, while isEazy Author's integration APIs score lower at 8.1, suggesting that Easygenerator may offer more flexibility in tailoring the software to specific user needs.
- Users say that Easygenerator has a quality of support rating of 9.7, which is slightly lower than isEazy Author's perfect score of 10.0, indicating that isEazy Author may provide superior customer support and assistance to its users.
- 2 question types
- Publish courses to the Easygenerator cloud
- 5GB of storage
- 1 author
- Unlimited projects
Very simple to use. Wide range of useful functionality. Drag and drop interface. Plenty of publishing options to suit most requirements. LRS and reporting means no need to use separate LMS unless desired. Excellent value for money. Great mobile...
EXtremely slow and time consuming. Very limited formats acceptable. Not too user friendly.
Although its performance is made for everyone to use, the results are awesome, much more professional than I expected.
I don't have many bad things to say, but to mention something, what was most difficult was getting the hang of the linked scenes. As I mentioned, the interactives are very useful for us, but this one in particular took us a little longer to learn how to use...
Very simple to use. Wide range of useful functionality. Drag and drop interface. Plenty of publishing options to suit most requirements. LRS and reporting means no need to use separate LMS unless desired. Excellent value for money. Great mobile...
Although its performance is made for everyone to use, the results are awesome, much more professional than I expected.
EXtremely slow and time consuming. Very limited formats acceptable. Not too user friendly.
I don't have many bad things to say, but to mention something, what was most difficult was getting the hang of the linked scenes. As I mentioned, the interactives are very useful for us, but this one in particular took us a little longer to learn how to use...
