Compare Drupal and Umbraco 
- Users report that Drupal excels in its developer tools, with a score of 8.8, making it a preferred choice for developers looking for robust customization options. In contrast, Umbraco, while still strong, scores slightly lower at 8.4.
- Reviewers mention that Umbraco offers a more user-friendly experience, reflected in its ease of use score of 8.7 compared to Drupal's 6.8. This makes Umbraco a better option for non-technical users who prioritize simplicity.
- G2 users highlight that Drupal's content authoring capabilities are impressive, scoring 8.3, but Umbraco edges ahead with a score of 8.8, particularly due to its intuitive rich text editor and content scheduling features.
- Users on G2 report that Drupal's flexibility in customization is a strong point, with a score of 8.3, but Umbraco shines with a higher score of 8.7, especially in branding and themes, allowing for more tailored website designs.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms have solid asset management features, but Umbraco's score of 8.0 is slightly better than Drupal's 7.3, indicating a more streamlined approach to managing digital assets.
- Users say that while both platforms support multi-language capabilities, Umbraco's score of 8.5 suggests a more robust implementation, making it a better choice for businesses targeting diverse markets.
- Open Source CMS
- Web Content Management with Infinite editing
- Language Variants
Drupal is far more flexible than any other CMS I've ever used. You can build pretty much anything with it if you apply best practices and sensible architecture. People say Drupal is complicated but they are referring to the developer experience. For an...
The backend (for admins) is complicated, and not intuitive, the set up of modules and nodes is cumbersome and implementation of these is outdated, the front-end also doesnt come close to delivering a decent UX. I guess it could work for sites that spend...
The interface in umbraco is very easy to use, the standard components are easy to use and the integration with .net is better than most other CMS systems. The amount of separation between the code and content is nice, especially with the helper libraries.
Not been very user friendly for ease of use as a CMS. taken a while to build out so other tools we use frequently like wordpress have been better.
Drupal is far more flexible than any other CMS I've ever used. You can build pretty much anything with it if you apply best practices and sensible architecture. People say Drupal is complicated but they are referring to the developer experience. For an...
The interface in umbraco is very easy to use, the standard components are easy to use and the integration with .net is better than most other CMS systems. The amount of separation between the code and content is nice, especially with the helper libraries.
The backend (for admins) is complicated, and not intuitive, the set up of modules and nodes is cumbersome and implementation of these is outdated, the front-end also doesnt come close to delivering a decent UX. I guess it could work for sites that spend...
Not been very user friendly for ease of use as a CMS. taken a while to build out so other tools we use frequently like wordpress have been better.
