Compare Drupal and Sitecore Digital Experience Platform 
- Users report that Drupal excels in Developer Tools with a score of 9.2, making it a preferred choice for developers looking for robust customization options. In contrast, Sitecore's developer tools score lower, indicating less flexibility for technical users.
- Reviewers mention that Drupal's Content Authoring capabilities are highly rated at 8.3, providing a user-friendly experience for content creators. Sitecore, while still competent at 7.9, does not match the ease of use that Drupal offers in this area.
- G2 users highlight Drupal's superior Website Staging feature, scoring 9.3, which allows for seamless content updates and testing before going live. Sitecore's staging capabilities are less robust, which can hinder the content deployment process.
- Users on G2 emphasize that Drupal's Personalization features are outstanding, with a score of 9.1, allowing for tailored user experiences. Sitecore, while also strong in personalization, scores lower at 8.0, indicating that Drupal may provide more advanced options.
- Reviewers mention that Drupal's Asset Management is rated at 8.2, which is slightly higher than Sitecore's 7.5, suggesting that users find Drupal's asset handling more efficient and user-friendly.
- Users say that Drupal's Multi-CMS Support is exceptional, scoring 9.6, which is crucial for organizations managing multiple content management systems. Sitecore's support in this area is not as strong, which may limit its appeal for larger enterprises with diverse needs.
The best thing about Drupal is the flexibility and complex functionality available for developing a site without necessarily knowing advanced PHP and Javascript. Major projects can be accomplished with Drupal where other CMS's could not even come close to...
The backend (for admins) is complicated, and not intuitive, the set up of modules and nodes is cumbersome and implementation of these is outdated, the front-end also doesnt come close to delivering a decent UX. I guess it could work for sites that spend...
I enjoy how user friendly the content editor is. It allows users with little knowledge of css and html to edit pages without any problems.
Although Sitecore is powerful, it's also clunky and way too much of a system for a smaller company to use. I have used several different CMS systems, and Sitecore is probably one of the most challenging. If you don't use a process with several steps for...
The best thing about Drupal is the flexibility and complex functionality available for developing a site without necessarily knowing advanced PHP and Javascript. Major projects can be accomplished with Drupal where other CMS's could not even come close to...
I enjoy how user friendly the content editor is. It allows users with little knowledge of css and html to edit pages without any problems.
The backend (for admins) is complicated, and not intuitive, the set up of modules and nodes is cumbersome and implementation of these is outdated, the front-end also doesnt come close to delivering a decent UX. I guess it could work for sites that spend...
Although Sitecore is powerful, it's also clunky and way too much of a system for a smaller company to use. I have used several different CMS systems, and Sitecore is probably one of the most challenging. If you don't use a process with several steps for...
