Compare Drata and Thoropass 
- Users report that Thoropass excels in "Quality of Support" with a score of 9.5, while Drata also performs well with a score of 9.7, indicating that both products are highly regarded for their customer service, but Drata has a slight edge.
- Reviewers mention that Thoropass offers a more user-friendly experience with an "Ease of Use" score of 8.9 compared to Drata's 9.2, suggesting that Drata may have a more intuitive interface that users find easier to navigate.
- G2 users highlight that Thoropass shines in "Anomaly Detection" with a score of 9.4, while Drata falls behind with a score of 8.3, indicating that Thoropass may provide more robust features for identifying unusual activities.
- Users on G2 report that Drata's "Centralized Vendor Catalog" feature is particularly strong, scoring 9.1, compared to Thoropass's 8.7, suggesting that Drata may offer better organization and management of vendor information.
- Reviewers mention that both products perform well in "Security Auditing," with Thoropass scoring 9.3 and Drata slightly higher at 9.5, indicating that Drata may provide more comprehensive auditing capabilities.
- Users say that while both products have strong "Compliance Monitoring" features, Drata's score of 9.5 outshines Thoropass's 9.3, suggesting that Drata may offer more effective tools for ensuring compliance with regulations.
- Unlimited Admins
- Unlimited Integrations (140+ to choose from)
- Dynamic Policy Builder
There are a lot of vendors to choose from for SOC 2 automation. We chose Drata because their team has former auditors and their CEO Adam understands there is much more to SOC 2 than just checking the box for compliance. We decided to use Drata for our...
The real downside of using drata was the fact that Auditors were reluctant to use it. All the evidence was there in the platform and visible for them to use, but they still wanted us to walk them through all of our controls over video chats. This defeated...
In every step of the way, Thoropass is there to help. Without any previous SOC2 experience, I was able to certify our company. Without the professionnal help from Thoropass, I would have never been able to do it in the short period it took me with them.
The application wasn't intuitive. Tasks and information were spread across a few parts of the application. Terminology was often incosistent or confusing. It was hard to find the things that needed to be done. It was difficult to understand the...
There are a lot of vendors to choose from for SOC 2 automation. We chose Drata because their team has former auditors and their CEO Adam understands there is much more to SOC 2 than just checking the box for compliance. We decided to use Drata for our...
In every step of the way, Thoropass is there to help. Without any previous SOC2 experience, I was able to certify our company. Without the professionnal help from Thoropass, I would have never been able to do it in the short period it took me with them.
The real downside of using drata was the fact that Auditors were reluctant to use it. All the evidence was there in the platform and visible for them to use, but they still wanted us to walk them through all of our controls over video chats. This defeated...
The application wasn't intuitive. Tasks and information were spread across a few parts of the application. Terminology was often incosistent or confusing. It was hard to find the things that needed to be done. It was difficult to understand the...
