Compare Cyclr and Tray.ai 
- Users report that Cyclr excels in "Quality of Support" with a score of 9.7, indicating that many find the support team responsive and helpful, while Tray.ai's support quality is rated lower at 8.8, suggesting room for improvement in customer service.
- Reviewers mention that Cyclr's "Data Security" features are robust, scoring 9.6, which includes strong data encryption and compliance standards, whereas Tray.ai's data security is rated at 8.1, leading to concerns about potential vulnerabilities.
- G2 users highlight Cyclr's superior "Integration" capabilities with a score of 9.5, allowing for seamless connections with various applications, while Tray.ai's integration score of 8.1 indicates it may not offer the same breadth of options.
- Users on G2 note that Cyclr's "Real-Time Integration" is highly effective, scoring 9.0, which is crucial for businesses needing immediate data updates, compared to Tray.ai's score of 9.3, which, while still strong, may not match Cyclr's overall performance in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Cyclr's "Workflow Automation" features are particularly user-friendly, scoring 9.1, making it easier for teams to automate processes, while Tray.ai's score of 8.9 suggests it may not be as intuitive for users looking to streamline their workflows.
- Users say that Cyclr's "Reusable Connectors" feature, rated at 8.8, allows for greater efficiency in integration tasks, while Tray.ai's score of 9.4 indicates it has a strong offering in this area, but Cyclr's overall flexibility in connector management is often praised.
- Unlimited Integrations
- Unlimited Users
- 10 Pre-Made Connectors
- All of the benefits
- Multi-region support
- Advanced on-premise connectivity
Ease of use, comprehensiveness, Ability to switch between simple and advanced views to build a logical integration with clear flows. This is such a comprehensive suite of offerings it's hard to fathom why this doesn't have a broader market share. It is so...
Would be easier to calculate if pricing was only calculated on task usage and not per connector p/m pricing as well. Its not expensive at all, but harder to forecast when usage is varies naturally.
The UI is great in my opinion! I love being able to clearly follow a diagram that shows how the pieces interact with eachother and being able to drag-drop is fantastic. Tray is one of the few/rare tools that allows for quick start-up and is overall...
In the last few months, Tray has managed to delete our users, attempt to recover them, and fail -> certain customers could not access the Tray embedded integrations that are available to them due to Tray errors. Tray's inability to change the timeout of...
Ease of use, comprehensiveness, Ability to switch between simple and advanced views to build a logical integration with clear flows. This is such a comprehensive suite of offerings it's hard to fathom why this doesn't have a broader market share. It is so...
The UI is great in my opinion! I love being able to clearly follow a diagram that shows how the pieces interact with eachother and being able to drag-drop is fantastic. Tray is one of the few/rare tools that allows for quick start-up and is overall...
Would be easier to calculate if pricing was only calculated on task usage and not per connector p/m pricing as well. Its not expensive at all, but harder to forecast when usage is varies naturally.
In the last few months, Tray has managed to delete our users, attempt to recover them, and fail -> certain customers could not access the Tray embedded integrations that are available to them due to Tray errors. Tray's inability to change the timeout of...
