Compare Cyclr and Prismatic 
- Users report that Cyclr excels in its Quality of Support, scoring 9.7, which reviewers mention as being responsive and helpful, while Prismatic also performs well with a score of 9.8, indicating a slight edge in customer service.
- Reviewers mention that Cyclr's Real-Time Integration feature is rated at 9.0, which is praised for its reliability, but Prismatic outshines with a score of 9.4, suggesting a more robust integration capability that users find beneficial for immediate data synchronization.
- Users on G2 highlight Cyclr's Flow Designer with a score of 8.7, noting its user-friendly interface, while Prismatic's Flow Designer scores higher at 9.1, indicating a more intuitive design process that users appreciate for creating workflows.
- G2 users report that Cyclr's Custom Connectors score 8.5, which some find limiting, whereas Prismatic's Custom Connectors score 9.2, allowing for greater flexibility and adaptability in connecting various applications.
- Reviewers mention that Cyclr's Monitoring & Notification feature scores 7.6, which some users find lacking in functionality, while Prismatic's feature scores significantly higher at 9.1, providing more comprehensive monitoring capabilities that users find essential for operational oversight.
- Users say that Cyclr's Data Encryption is rated at 8.8, which is satisfactory, but Prismatic's score of 9.1 indicates a stronger emphasis on security, with users feeling more confident in their data protection measures.
- Unlimited Integrations
- Unlimited Users
- 10 Pre-Made Connectors
- Build unlimited integrations
- Use unlimited app connectors
- Low-code integration designer
Ease of use, comprehensiveness, Ability to switch between simple and advanced views to build a logical integration with clear flows. This is such a comprehensive suite of offerings it's hard to fathom why this doesn't have a broader market share. It is so...
Would be easier to calculate if pricing was only calculated on task usage and not per connector p/m pricing as well. Its not expensive at all, but harder to forecast when usage is varies naturally.
I love powerful prism CLI. It allows me to quickly develop a custom component for any situation, publish it into our private library, and use it within a flow in seconds.
* Difficult understanding of the whole system * Some components is present, but don't work * Lack of useful information in docs. Something is written but probably it is clear only for Prismatic developers * No concreate video examples in the Internet
Ease of use, comprehensiveness, Ability to switch between simple and advanced views to build a logical integration with clear flows. This is such a comprehensive suite of offerings it's hard to fathom why this doesn't have a broader market share. It is so...
I love powerful prism CLI. It allows me to quickly develop a custom component for any situation, publish it into our private library, and use it within a flow in seconds.
Would be easier to calculate if pricing was only calculated on task usage and not per connector p/m pricing as well. Its not expensive at all, but harder to forecast when usage is varies naturally.
* Difficult understanding of the whole system * Some components is present, but don't work * Lack of useful information in docs. Something is written but probably it is clear only for Prismatic developers * No concreate video examples in the Internet
