Compare Crowd and Keycloak 
- Users report that Crowd excels in its "Ease of installation on server" with a score of 9.2, making it a preferred choice for organizations looking for a straightforward setup process. In contrast, Keycloak's installation ease is rated lower at 8.4, which some users find less intuitive.
- Reviewers mention that Keycloak shines in "Password Policy Enforcement" with a score of 9.4, indicating robust features that help organizations maintain strong security protocols. Crowd, while still effective, has a slightly lower score of 8.8 in this area, suggesting it may not offer as comprehensive options.
- G2 users highlight Keycloak's superior "Remote Access" capabilities, scoring 9.2, which is particularly beneficial for organizations with a distributed workforce. Crowd's score of 8.7 indicates it may not be as effective in supporting remote users as Keycloak.
- Users on G2 appreciate Crowd's "Ease of connecting applications," which received a high score of 9.0, making integration with existing systems seamless. Keycloak, however, scored lower at 8.3, leading some users to experience challenges during the integration process.
- Reviewers say that both products offer strong "Federation/SAML support," with identical scores of 8.7. However, users mention that Keycloak's implementation is often perceived as more user-friendly, enhancing the overall experience for developers and administrators.
- Users report that while both platforms support multiple operating systems equally well, Keycloak's "Fail over protection" is rated significantly higher at 8.5 compared to Crowd's 6.7, indicating that Keycloak may provide better reliability and uptime for critical applications.
I can use crowd to offload authentication so JIRA and my other applications don't have to handle the extra load. It also allows me to specify multiple different authentication sources for my applications and allows SSO capabilities within the Atlassian tools.
Crowd really only works well with Atlassian products. Outside of Atlassian, it is not much of a SSO solution. In theory, you can use Crowd with any applications, but because it does not use or support any open standard, such as SAML, you will need to create...
The handling of user in UI and that will make the work easier.
Customizing flow is extremely hard. Some time ago we had a specific business requirement and customisation took us over a month of pain and reverse engineering. Also documentation is not good, it was easier to find something in RFC than in Keycloak docs.
I can use crowd to offload authentication so JIRA and my other applications don't have to handle the extra load. It also allows me to specify multiple different authentication sources for my applications and allows SSO capabilities within the Atlassian tools.
The handling of user in UI and that will make the work easier.
Crowd really only works well with Atlassian products. Outside of Atlassian, it is not much of a SSO solution. In theory, you can use Crowd with any applications, but because it does not use or support any open standard, such as SAML, you will need to create...
Customizing flow is extremely hard. Some time ago we had a specific business requirement and customisation took us over a month of pain and reverse engineering. Also documentation is not good, it was easier to find something in RFC than in Keycloak docs.
