Compare Concrete CMS and Craft CMS 
- Users report that Craft CMS excels in its content authoring capabilities, with a score of 8.7, while Concrete CMS follows closely with 8.6. Reviewers mention that Craft's intuitive interface makes it easier for content creators to manage and publish their work efficiently.
- Reviewers mention that Concrete CMS offers a more robust multi-language support feature, scoring 8.7 compared to Craft CMS's lack of a specific rating in this area. Users on G2 appreciate the seamless experience when managing content in multiple languages with Concrete CMS.
- Users say that Craft CMS shines in customization options, scoring 8.5, while Concrete CMS scores slightly higher at 8.8. Reviewers highlight Craft's flexibility in allowing developers to create tailored solutions that meet specific business needs.
- G2 users report that Concrete CMS has a better overall user experience, with an ease of use score of 9.1 compared to Craft CMS's 8.2. Users mention that Concrete's straightforward setup process and user-friendly interface make it accessible for small businesses.
- Reviewers mention that Craft CMS has a superior quality of support, scoring 8.2, while Concrete CMS received a lower score of 7.6. Users appreciate Craft's responsive customer service and extensive documentation, which helps them resolve issues quickly.
- Users on G2 report that Concrete CMS has a more favorable product direction, with a score of 8.4 compared to Craft CMS's 7.2. Reviewers say that Concrete's commitment to continuous improvement and feature updates gives them confidence in the platform's future viability.
As user: ease of use for designing frontend and backend, graphical editing interface, powerful functionality and lots of features already built in incl. mobile, it's free, it's open source, based on modern technology, attention to security and permissions,...
My least favorite thing is that Concrete 5 isn't as widespread as some other web platforms. So there's fewer widget options and support. I liked how simple it was to implement, as I don't have a ton of web development experience, but when I got stuck, I...
The devices for the administration of resources are fantastic. It empowers the clients to plan designs for custom pages using content fields and blocks that are straightforwardly connected with the site's code layouts. The live review altering highlight is...
Not very robust if you want to add new features such as videos and requiring sub headers when you don't want any.
As user: ease of use for designing frontend and backend, graphical editing interface, powerful functionality and lots of features already built in incl. mobile, it's free, it's open source, based on modern technology, attention to security and permissions,...
The devices for the administration of resources are fantastic. It empowers the clients to plan designs for custom pages using content fields and blocks that are straightforwardly connected with the site's code layouts. The live review altering highlight is...
My least favorite thing is that Concrete 5 isn't as widespread as some other web platforms. So there's fewer widget options and support. I liked how simple it was to implement, as I don't have a ton of web development experience, but when I got stuck, I...
Not very robust if you want to add new features such as videos and requiring sub headers when you don't want any.
