Compare CodeSignal and Woven 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (49.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (73.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 User
Free Trial 5 Candidates
CodeSignal
Star Rating
(694)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (49.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 User
Learn more about CodeSignalWoven
Star Rating
(1,142)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (73.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial 5 Candidates
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that CodeSignal excels in its "Technical Screening" feature, with a score of 9.2, making it a preferred choice for companies focused on assessing coding skills effectively. In contrast, Woven's "Technical Screening" feature scores slightly higher at 9.3, indicating a marginally better experience for users looking for comprehensive technical assessments.
- Reviewers mention that Woven offers superior "Soft Skills Testing" capabilities, scoring 9.1 compared to CodeSignal's 8.3. This suggests that Woven may provide a more holistic approach to candidate evaluation, which is increasingly important in today's hiring landscape.
- G2 users highlight that both platforms have similar "Ease of Use" ratings at 9.2, but CodeSignal shines in "Ease of Admin" with a score of 9.6, indicating that administrators find it easier to manage compared to Woven's 9.2 rating.
- Users on G2 report that Woven's "Quality of Support" is notably high at 9.5, which may be a deciding factor for businesses that prioritize customer service and support during their software usage. CodeSignal, while still strong at 9.0, does not match this level of support satisfaction.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms have robust "Integrations" capabilities, with Woven scoring 8.8 and CodeSignal at 8.5. However, users note that Woven's integrations are more seamless with popular HR tools, enhancing its usability in diverse environments.
- Users say that Woven's "Customization" options are more flexible, scoring 8.7 compared to CodeSignal's 8.3. This flexibility allows businesses to tailor the software more closely to their specific needs, which is a significant advantage for companies with unique workflows.
Featured Products
Sponsored
LuGo-Test
(27)
Video Interviewing
Visit Website
Sponsored
Willo Video Interviewing
(200)
Video Interviewing
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
CodeSignal
Pre-Screen & Interview
Contact Us
1 User
Contact us for custom pricing tailored to your needs.
- Validated pre-screen assessments
- Advanced live interviewing tool
- Industry-leading IDE
Woven
Free Trial
Free Trial
5 Candidates
Try before you by! Create your first assessment, benchmark with your team and send up to 5 candidates.
- Create 1 Assessment
- Unlimited Candidate Invites
- Up to 5 Candidate Results
Free Trial
CodeSignal
Free Trial is available
Woven
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
430
9.4
537
Ease of Use
9.2
437
9.2
558
Ease of Setup
9.1
26
9.2
64
Ease of Admin
9.6
24
9.2
42
Quality of Support
9.0
352
9.5
468
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.6
24
9.6
41
Product Direction (% positive)
8.0
387
9.2
514
Features by Category
Platform Basics
8.4
129
8.8
298
8.5
141
8.7
310
9.0
220
9.2
357
Platform Content
8.3
130
8.6
289
8.7
152
8.7
304
8.3
145
8.7
300
9.2
222
9.3
390
9.0
225
9.1
374
8.9
183
8.8
318
Platform Additional Functionality
8.9
200
8.9
316
8.8
156
8.8
297
8.4
126
8.8
290
8.3
108
Feature Not Available
8.3
149
9.1
330
8.8
139
8.9
297
Platform Basics
9.4
22
Not enough data
8.9
21
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
8.8
24
Not enough data
Platform Content
9.1
29
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
8.3
24
Not enough data
Platform Additional Functionality
8.6
22
Not enough data
8.7
21
Not enough data
8.1
22
Not enough data
9.2
24
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
CodeSignal and Woven are categorized as Technical Skills Screening
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
CodeSignal
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Woven
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
61.9%
Information Technology and Services
13.6%
Financial Services
3.6%
Internet
2.5%
Higher Education
2.5%
Other
15.8%
Computer Software
59.9%
Information Technology and Services
15.9%
Financial Services
2.7%
Computer & Network Security
2.7%
Program Development
2.4%
Other
16.4%
Most Helpful Reviews
CodeSignal
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Adam P.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
CodeSignal has really helped us scale the top of our interview funnel. Sending out an assessment is virtually zero-cost on our end, and it's very straightforward for candidates to use. It's a simple way for us to evaluate many candidates at the top of our...
Most Helpful Critical Review
Erik B.
Verified User in Computer Software
Nothing—it was a pleasant experience taking an interview using the CodeSignal platform.
Woven
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Robert H.
Verified User in Computer Software
Woven has been very easy to integrate into our existing hiring process, and the results have been great. Candidates report being happy with the Woven process, which is extremely important to us. The analysis Woven provides for a candidate are intuitive and...
Most Helpful Critical Review
Sergey Y.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
The assignments are time limited. This adds some unwanted pressure to the process.
Adam P.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
CodeSignal has really helped us scale the top of our interview funnel. Sending out an assessment is virtually zero-cost on our end, and it's very straightforward for candidates to use. It's a simple way for us to evaluate many candidates at the top of our...
Robert H.
Verified User in Computer Software
Woven has been very easy to integrate into our existing hiring process, and the results have been great. Candidates report being happy with the Woven process, which is extremely important to us. The analysis Woven provides for a candidate are intuitive and...
Erik B.
Verified User in Computer Software
Nothing—it was a pleasant experience taking an interview using the CodeSignal platform.
Sergey Y.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
The assignments are time limited. This adds some unwanted pressure to the process.
Discussions
How do I select more programming languages to test a candidate?
3 comments
JB
Hello there, its a good thing to test the candidate before selecting. But, it's from the admin side that it is not appearing to be selected. You can contact...Read more
What is the best way to make the most out of this platform?
3 comments
HC
There is a two section they may help you too much :
Company challenges
Interview practice
you find a lot of challenges used by well know companies,...Read more
ATS Integrations
1 comment
Official Response from CodeSignal
Yes! We are tightly integrated with most popular ATS systems including Greenhouse, Lever, iCIMS, Workday and many others. Read more
Woven has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
