When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Thermo Scientific SampleManager LIMS Software easier to use and administer. However, reviewers felt that CGM LABDAQ was easier to do business with overall. Finally, reviewers felt that the products are equally easy to set up.
Easy to use. Keyboard shortcuts make life a lot better.
onboarding was meant to take 6-8 weeks. We are about 6 months into trying to get system set-up and still have not been able to go live Workflow management processes are not intuitive We are a cannabis lab, so definitely lots more work to be done with...
Software is developed with end users in mind. Lab workflows and processes are easily configured. Out of the box configuration can get a lab up and running in no time. LIMS admin support tools are easy to manage and understand with time and use.
It's a shame that the core of the schedule is fixed. Accordingly, the existing schedule creation rules had to be changed.
Easy to use. Keyboard shortcuts make life a lot better.
Software is developed with end users in mind. Lab workflows and processes are easily configured. Out of the box configuration can get a lab up and running in no time. LIMS admin support tools are easy to manage and understand with time and use.
onboarding was meant to take 6-8 weeks. We are about 6 months into trying to get system set-up and still have not been able to go live Workflow management processes are not intuitive We are a cannabis lab, so definitely lots more work to be done with...
It's a shame that the core of the schedule is fixed. Accordingly, the existing schedule creation rules had to be changed.