- Home
- ...
- Version Control Software
- CA Harvest Software Change Manager
- Git
- CA Harvest Software Change Manager-vs-Git
Compare CA Harvest Software Change Manager and Git 
- Reviews say that CA Harvest Software Change Manager excels in its robust support for enterprise-level projects, with a strong focus on compliance and security features, which is crucial for larger organizations.
- Users report that Git shines in its flexibility and speed, particularly for small to medium-sized teams, allowing for rapid development cycles and easy branching and merging capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that the quality of support for CA Harvest Software Change Manager is rated highly at 9.2, indicating that users feel well-supported when issues arise, which is essential for maintaining productivity in enterprise environments.
- G2 users highlight that Git's ease of setup is a significant advantage, with a score of 8.8, making it accessible for teams looking to implement version control quickly without extensive training.
- Users on G2 report that while CA Harvest Software Change Manager has a solid product direction score of 7.7, Git outperforms with a score of 9.0, suggesting that Git is more aligned with modern development practices and user needs.
- Reviewers mention that both products have similar ease of use ratings, with CA Harvest at 8.3 and Git at 8.1, but Git's community-driven resources and documentation provide additional support for users navigating the software.
It allows user to set up various repositories and folders as many as the company require
Its costly, license cost is more ,it should be reasonable
My favorite feature of git by far is its ability to manage multiple branches and merge them in when they are complete. Also, 'git status' is beautiful in its simplicity and ease to generally know exactly what you've done. With 'git status' I can quickly...
Literally everything. Obtuse and hostile syntax, "help" written for people who don't need help, too easy to get into a situation where the rational choice is to vote everything away and start from scratch.
It allows user to set up various repositories and folders as many as the company require
My favorite feature of git by far is its ability to manage multiple branches and merge them in when they are complete. Also, 'git status' is beautiful in its simplicity and ease to generally know exactly what you've done. With 'git status' I can quickly...
Its costly, license cost is more ,it should be reasonable
Literally everything. Obtuse and hostile syntax, "help" written for people who don't need help, too easy to get into a situation where the rational choice is to vote everything away and start from scratch.
