Compare Butter CMS and Cockpit CMS 
- Users report that Cockpit CMS has a lower ease of use rating (8.3) compared to Butter CMS (9.2), indicating that Butter CMS may provide a more intuitive user experience for content authors.
- Reviewers mention that the quality of support for Butter CMS is significantly higher (9.6) than that of Cockpit CMS (7.0), suggesting that users of Butter CMS may receive more effective assistance when needed.
- G2 users highlight that the content authoring capabilities of Butter CMS (9.2) are superior to those of Cockpit CMS (7.9), making it a better choice for teams focused on creating and managing content efficiently.
- Users on G2 note that the asset management features in Butter CMS (8.1) are more robust compared to Cockpit CMS (7.1), which can be crucial for organizations that rely heavily on digital assets.
- Reviewers say that the automated publishing feature in Butter CMS (9.0) outperforms Cockpit CMS (8.3), allowing for more streamlined content deployment processes.
- Users report that the API and integrations of Butter CMS (8.9) are more flexible and user-friendly than those of Cockpit CMS (8.3), which can enhance the overall functionality and connectivity of the software within existing tech stacks.
- Enterprise-class SLA
- Multiple Environments
- Multiple Sites
Simple to config, easy to use. The doc is very clear and the api very fast. I think this is the most easy api I had to use for the past three years and I'm going to tell everyone to use it when they want to create a simple blog application even a complex...
Awful for content-heavy sites. They charge per blog post and require you to upgrade and pay A LOT more to publish more blog posts. The backend is clunky and buggy. Minor updates to a blog post can break links. You need a developer to do anything...
Cockpit CMS allows developers to utilize their normal stack of web technologies (for me, Laravel and VueJS) while still allowing the client to have full control over content-managed areas of the site. This is different from most CMS applications (e.g....
Cockpit CMS still doesn't have a feature wherein it can track the changes with respect to the time they are made and by whom they are made. Another downfall is the slightly complicated interface which could be made more user friendly for people from non...
Simple to config, easy to use. The doc is very clear and the api very fast. I think this is the most easy api I had to use for the past three years and I'm going to tell everyone to use it when they want to create a simple blog application even a complex...
Cockpit CMS allows developers to utilize their normal stack of web technologies (for me, Laravel and VueJS) while still allowing the client to have full control over content-managed areas of the site. This is different from most CMS applications (e.g....
Awful for content-heavy sites. They charge per blog post and require you to upgrade and pay A LOT more to publish more blog posts. The backend is clunky and buggy. Minor updates to a blog post can break links. You need a developer to do anything...
Cockpit CMS still doesn't have a feature wherein it can track the changes with respect to the time they are made and by whom they are made. Another downfall is the slightly complicated interface which could be made more user friendly for people from non...
