Compare Boomi and Celigo 
- Users report that Boomi excels in its Reusable Connectors feature, scoring 9.6, which allows for efficient integration across multiple applications, while Celigo's score of 9.3 indicates it also offers strong capabilities but may not be as flexible in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Celigo's Real-Time Integration functionality is highly rated at 9.2, providing seamless data flow, whereas Boomi's score of 8.7 suggests it may not be as robust in real-time scenarios.
- G2 users highlight Boomi's Data Manipulation capabilities with a score of 9.1, which allows for advanced data handling, while Celigo's score in this area is not specified, indicating a potential gap in user satisfaction.
- Users on G2 appreciate Celigo's API Testing feature, which received a high score of 9.8, showcasing its effectiveness in ensuring API reliability, compared to Boomi's score of 8.8, which suggests room for improvement.
- Reviewers say that Celigo's Data Security features are rated at 9.5, indicating a strong emphasis on protecting sensitive information, while Boomi's score of 8.6 suggests it may not meet the same level of security expectations.
- Users report that both platforms offer solid Data Mapping capabilities, with Boomi scoring 9.6 and Celigo at 9.4, but Boomi's slight edge indicates a more user-friendly experience in this critical integration task.
- 2 Endpoint apps
Below are some of the highlights I can put forward: # Lucid documentation of the product. # Manual configuration of runtime engine is really awesome, for this one reason I could say BOOMI is an best product among iPaaS providers. # Well to get into more...
1. We had a scenario where large volumes of data had to be migrated. Finally we ran to issues and couldn't do that successful with Boomi. The reason is that the memory allotted for an atom is required to execute large volume. The alternate way which Boomi...
The UI and platform is very easy-to-use. When customizing flows, field names populate automatically from Salesforce and NetSuite. You don't have to manage obscure ID names which can be confusing for non-technical users.
There is not much to complain about. The connector works like a charm and is perfectly suited for our needs. The only is the timeframe was a bit drawn out due to some issues on our end. But overall an excellent experience.
Below are some of the highlights I can put forward: # Lucid documentation of the product. # Manual configuration of runtime engine is really awesome, for this one reason I could say BOOMI is an best product among iPaaS providers. # Well to get into more...
The UI and platform is very easy-to-use. When customizing flows, field names populate automatically from Salesforce and NetSuite. You don't have to manage obscure ID names which can be confusing for non-technical users.
1. We had a scenario where large volumes of data had to be migrated. Finally we ran to issues and couldn't do that successful with Boomi. The reason is that the memory allotted for an atom is required to execute large volume. The alternate way which Boomi...
There is not much to complain about. The connector works like a charm and is perfectly suited for our needs. The only is the timeframe was a bit drawn out due to some issues on our end. But overall an excellent experience.
