Compare Benchling and LabWare LIMS 
- Users report that LabWare LIMS excels in Data Storage with a score of 9.4, highlighting its robust capabilities for managing large datasets, while Benchling, with a score of 8.8, is noted for its user-friendly interface but may not handle extensive data as efficiently.
- Reviewers mention that LabWare LIMS offers superior Inventory Management at 9.1, with features like real-time tracking and automated alerts, whereas Benchling's score of 7.8 indicates it may lack some advanced inventory functionalities that users desire.
- G2 users appreciate LabWare LIMS for its strong Quality of Support, scoring 9.0, with many noting quick response times and knowledgeable staff, while Benchling, scoring 8.4, has received mixed reviews regarding support availability and response times.
- Users on G2 highlight that Benchling shines in ELN Support with a score of 9.2, particularly praising its intuitive design and ease of use for electronic lab notebooks, while LabWare LIMS, at 8.6, is seen as more complex and less user-friendly in this area.
- Reviewers say that LabWare LIMS provides excellent Data Access Authorization features, scoring 9.3, which allows for detailed user permissions and security protocols, while Benchling's score of 8.0 suggests it may not offer the same level of granularity in access control.
- Users report that LabWare LIMS has a strong focus on Compliance and Intellectual Protection, scoring 9.1, which is crucial for regulated industries, while Benchling, with a score of 8.3, is seen as less comprehensive in meeting stringent compliance requirements.
the user-friendly interface and the template tab makes easy and fast to keep record of the experiment.
Plate to plate transfer tables are cumbersome, painful and take longer than the actual cell culture work. Should be a "drag and drop" feature, well to plate for example and increment passage... Difficult to distinguish titles in tabs for multiple...
The ability to create custom data sets to meet the data gathering need rapidly, including complex calculations across tests and samples. Summarized data for reporting automatically saving hours in data processing, data review and reporting
It's costly for any small-scale company. The system is complicated to implement and requires someone knowledgeable of the program. It's also not a very user-friendly program and requires a bit of training to learn how to use it.
the user-friendly interface and the template tab makes easy and fast to keep record of the experiment.
The ability to create custom data sets to meet the data gathering need rapidly, including complex calculations across tests and samples. Summarized data for reporting automatically saving hours in data processing, data review and reporting
Plate to plate transfer tables are cumbersome, painful and take longer than the actual cell culture work. Should be a "drag and drop" feature, well to plate for example and increment passage... Difficult to distinguish titles in tabs for multiple...
It's costly for any small-scale company. The system is complicated to implement and requires someone knowledgeable of the program. It's also not a very user-friendly program and requires a bit of training to learn how to use it.
