Compare Benchling and Labguru ELN LIMS 
- Users report that Benchling excels in its ELN Support with a score of 9.2, indicating a strong focus on electronic lab notebook functionalities, while Labguru ELN LIMS follows closely with a score of 9.0, suggesting both products are robust in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Labguru ELN LIMS shines in Quality of Support with a score of 9.4, significantly higher than Benchling's 8.4, highlighting Labguru's commitment to customer service and assistance.
- G2 users indicate that Benchling's Ease of Setup is rated at 8.9, which is slightly better than Labguru's 8.6, suggesting that users find Benchling easier to implement in their workflows.
- Users on G2 report that Labguru ELN LIMS has superior Inventory Management capabilities with a score of 8.4 compared to Benchling's 7.8, indicating that Labguru may offer more comprehensive tools for managing lab inventory.
- Reviewers mention that Benchling's Data Access Authorization features score 8.0, while Labguru ELN LIMS outperforms with a score of 8.8, suggesting that Labguru provides more robust options for controlling data access and security.
- Users say that both products have strong Workflow Management capabilities, each scoring 9.0, but Labguru's additional features in this area may provide a more tailored experience for specific lab processes.
Ease of use, intuitive GUI, Bioregistry that is geared towards DNA based constructs, warehouse access that collects data behind the scenes, roadmap includes features that are pertinent to me, excellent support, all of my CSAs have been top notch
registration tables, transgfer tables, lack of structure (it is a plane white sheet with limited text editing capacity), the storage system is too complicated for something that is designed for research lab not for GMP! it is not flexible enough I hate all...
As a young PI, organizing a new Lab with new students make all the process much easier. The ability to know online how every project is advancing is an advantage for a PI. The straightforward interface allows me to control the Lab goals better. The fact...
We need more real person support The addition of the new members is too complicated.
Ease of use, intuitive GUI, Bioregistry that is geared towards DNA based constructs, warehouse access that collects data behind the scenes, roadmap includes features that are pertinent to me, excellent support, all of my CSAs have been top notch
As a young PI, organizing a new Lab with new students make all the process much easier. The ability to know online how every project is advancing is an advantage for a PI. The straightforward interface allows me to control the Lab goals better. The fact...
registration tables, transgfer tables, lack of structure (it is a plane white sheet with limited text editing capacity), the storage system is too complicated for something that is designed for research lab not for GMP! it is not flexible enough I hate all...
We need more real person support The addition of the new members is too complicated.
