When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Azure Cloud Services easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Azure Cloud Services overall.
We use the Azure PaaS platform. We use Cloud Services (stateless web app servers built from a config file that you specify), Azure Storage (including Blob, Table and Queues) and Azure Infrastructure (stateful virtual machines). We use Cloud Services...
Nothing. This is a best in class product with equal comparison to aws
Mule ESB comes out of the box with a great suite of enterprise-level connectors, allowing quick, no-hassle wire-ups of standards-based processes. If your solutions are more custom, Mule is Spring-backed, meaning wiring up custom protocols is almost as easy...
Comprehensive Documentation which helps us getting started up with the pre-requisite and configurations is missing.
We use the Azure PaaS platform. We use Cloud Services (stateless web app servers built from a config file that you specify), Azure Storage (including Blob, Table and Queues) and Azure Infrastructure (stateful virtual machines). We use Cloud Services...
Mule ESB comes out of the box with a great suite of enterprise-level connectors, allowing quick, no-hassle wire-ups of standards-based processes. If your solutions are more custom, Mule is Spring-backed, meaning wiring up custom protocols is almost as easy...
Nothing. This is a best in class product with equal comparison to aws
Comprehensive Documentation which helps us getting started up with the pre-requisite and configurations is missing.