Compare Azure Blob Storage and IBM Cloud Object Storage 
- Users report that IBM Cloud Object Storage has a solid versioning feature, rated at 8.7, which allows for easy management of data changes, while Azure Blob Storage excels in scalability with a score of 9.3, making it a preferred choice for businesses anticipating rapid growth.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Blob Storage offers superior ease of use, scoring 9.1 compared to IBM's 8.0, indicating that users find Azure's interface more intuitive and user-friendly, which can significantly reduce the learning curve for new users.
- G2 users highlight that IBM Cloud Object Storage has a lower rating for ease of setup at 8.1, whereas Azure Blob Storage shines with a score of 9.0, suggesting that Azure provides a more streamlined onboarding process for new customers.
- Users on G2 report that Azure Blob Storage has a higher quality of support, rated at 8.8, compared to IBM's 8.0, which can be crucial for businesses that require timely assistance and guidance during critical operations.
- Reviewers say that IBM Cloud Object Storage's redundancy feature is rated at 8.8, which is commendable, but Azure Blob Storage surpasses it with a reliability score of 9.1, indicating a stronger assurance of data availability and durability.
- Users report that both products offer robust security features, but IBM Cloud Object Storage stands out with a higher encryption score of 9.2, which is a significant consideration for organizations prioritizing data protection and compliance.
Azure provides exclusive feature "containers" where we can create isolated storages with the following levels: public private and Container levels which makes it more easy for us to maintain access levels. Also we can create queues, functions for our...
That it is slow, i would recommend big businesses, or those who have large databases to use it; if you have a small application, you may want to use another faster storage
The foremost thing in the minds of users in a cloud environment is security and IBM helps deliver this alongside its hosting services perfectly. Also having servers to in a cloud environment powered by IBM is very time and cost effective.
I do believe the system could be updated to better reflect the systems needed to utilize the cloud platform
Azure provides exclusive feature "containers" where we can create isolated storages with the following levels: public private and Container levels which makes it more easy for us to maintain access levels. Also we can create queues, functions for our...
The foremost thing in the minds of users in a cloud environment is security and IBM helps deliver this alongside its hosting services perfectly. Also having servers to in a cloud environment powered by IBM is very time and cost effective.
That it is slow, i would recommend big businesses, or those who have large databases to use it; if you have a small application, you may want to use another faster storage
I do believe the system could be updated to better reflect the systems needed to utilize the cloud platform
