Compare Axosoft and Jira 
- Users report that Jira excels in its Kanban Board feature, scoring 8.8, which allows for effective visual management of tasks, while Axosoft, with a score of 8.5, offers a similar feature but lacks some of the advanced customization options that Jira provides.
- Reviewers mention that Jira's Time Tracking functionality, rated at 8.6, is robust and integrates well with other tools, whereas Axosoft's time tracking, rated at 9.0, is praised for its simplicity and ease of use, making it more accessible for smaller teams.
- G2 users highlight that Jira's Bug History feature, scoring 8.9, provides comprehensive tracking and reporting capabilities, which is essential for larger projects, while Axosoft's similar feature, rated at 8.8, is noted for its user-friendly interface but may not offer the same depth of analytics.
- Users on G2 report that Jira's Custom Workflows feature, with a score of 8.6, allows for extensive customization to fit various team needs, while Axosoft, scoring slightly higher at 8.8, is recognized for its intuitive setup process, making it easier for teams to implement.
- Reviewers say that Jira's Release Forecasting feature, rated at 8.3, provides valuable insights for planning, but Axosoft shines with a higher score of 9.0, indicating that users find it more reliable for predicting release timelines.
- Users report that while both products have strong Progress Monitoring capabilities, Jira's score of 8.8 is slightly lower than Axosoft's 8.9, with reviewers mentioning that Axosoft's visual progress indicators are particularly helpful for smaller teams needing quick insights.
- No user minimum.
Axosoft's Bug Tracker allows for exactly the kind of customization we need. We migrated from Plan.io and I initially tried to mirror that environment. Later, I realized that Axosoft can do even more and just ran with it. Also, we're just a small startup on...
Axosoft is rather difficult to use, outside of its very basics. If one chooses to simply focus on the tickets that have been assigned to them and do those, then Axosoft is very straightforward (however, a lot of tools can accomplish this)! However, one...
We use JIRA extensively for issue management and tracking. Each team has a project and it is a great way to work amongst teams and collaborate. The tool is very versatile and great to have project leaders, watchers, stakeholders, etc. They also have...
Consider three pitfalls when adopting JIRA - two pertaining to administration teams and one pertaining to end-users. Admin Pitfall #1: while JIRA does in fact allow administrators the ability to build customized issue types, workflows and artifacts,...
Axosoft's Bug Tracker allows for exactly the kind of customization we need. We migrated from Plan.io and I initially tried to mirror that environment. Later, I realized that Axosoft can do even more and just ran with it. Also, we're just a small startup on...
We use JIRA extensively for issue management and tracking. Each team has a project and it is a great way to work amongst teams and collaborate. The tool is very versatile and great to have project leaders, watchers, stakeholders, etc. They also have...
Axosoft is rather difficult to use, outside of its very basics. If one chooses to simply focus on the tickets that have been assigned to them and do those, then Axosoft is very straightforward (however, a lot of tools can accomplish this)! However, one...
Consider three pitfalls when adopting JIRA - two pertaining to administration teams and one pertaining to end-users. Admin Pitfall #1: while JIRA does in fact allow administrators the ability to build customized issue types, workflows and artifacts,...
