- Home
- ...
- Mobile App Testing Software
- AWS Device Farm
- Google Firebase Test Lab
- AWS Device Farm-vs-Google Firebase Test Lab
Compare AWS Device Farm and Google Firebase Test Lab 
- Users report that AWS Device Farm excels in its "Test Variety" feature, offering a wide range of real devices for testing, which reviewers mention is crucial for ensuring app compatibility across different platforms.
- Reviewers mention that Google Firebase Test Lab shines in its "Automation" capabilities, allowing for seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines, which users say significantly speeds up the testing process.
- G2 users highlight that AWS Device Farm has a superior "Quality of Support," with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, while users on G2 note that Google Firebase Test Lab's support can be slower to respond.
- Users say that AWS Device Farm's "Ease of Setup" is a strong point, with many finding the initial configuration straightforward, whereas reviewers mention that Google Firebase Test Lab can be more complex to set up due to its integration requirements.
- Reviewers mention that Google Firebase Test Lab provides better "Test Feedback," with detailed reports and logs that help developers quickly identify issues, while users report that AWS Device Farm's feedback can sometimes lack depth.
- Users on G2 report that AWS Device Farm's "Test History" feature is robust, allowing for easy tracking of past test results, while reviewers mention that Google Firebase Test Lab's history tracking is less comprehensive, making it harder to analyze trends over time.
AWS Device farm has made us test our any service or application on multiple devices with different hardware and software at the same time.It is very cost effective and speedy.You can use this as the best automatic testing application.Also you can manual...
The one thing i dislike is that sometimes it takes a whilw to load since thwre is a lot of people using it. People always have to be careful of what they use this for and what they are doing on it. Sometimes people use it for non work related ads
It doesn't need to be piped into any existing ci/cd process. The built in function without adding tests is very useful.
It's very limited, in the case of iOS testing you're only allowed to test using a .zip package containing a .testrunner file and the contents of the DerivedData/Build/Products directory. This is much more restrictive compared to AWS Device Farm, which has...
AWS Device farm has made us test our any service or application on multiple devices with different hardware and software at the same time.It is very cost effective and speedy.You can use this as the best automatic testing application.Also you can manual...
It doesn't need to be piped into any existing ci/cd process. The built in function without adding tests is very useful.
The one thing i dislike is that sometimes it takes a whilw to load since thwre is a lot of people using it. People always have to be careful of what they use this for and what they are doing on it. Sometimes people use it for non work related ads
It's very limited, in the case of iOS testing you're only allowed to test using a .zip package containing a .testrunner file and the contents of the DerivedData/Build/Products directory. This is much more restrictive compared to AWS Device Farm, which has...
