Best Software for 2025 is now live!

Compare Autodesk Fusion and SolidWorks Flow Simulation

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Autodesk Fusion
Autodesk Fusion
Star Rating
(493)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (69.4% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
$1,465.00 1 Subscription Per Year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plans
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
Star Rating
(35)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (48.5% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SolidWorks Flow Simulation
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Autodesk Fusion excels in CAD-CAM compatibility with a score of 8.8, making it easier to transition designs from CAD to CAM, while SolidWorks Flow Simulation has a lower score of 8.4 in this area, indicating potential challenges in integration.
  • Reviewers mention that Autodesk Fusion's modeling tools are highly rated at 9.2, providing a robust environment for 3D solid modeling, whereas SolidWorks Flow Simulation's modeling tools score 8.8, suggesting that Fusion may offer a more comprehensive set of features for complex designs.
  • G2 users highlight Autodesk Fusion's superior ease of setup with a score of 8.9, which is beneficial for new users, while SolidWorks Flow Simulation lacks in this area, with no score provided, indicating possible difficulties in initial configuration.
  • Users on G2 report that Autodesk Fusion's rendering tools are rated at 8.6, which allows for high-quality visualizations, while SolidWorks Flow Simulation's rendering tools score lower at 7.7, suggesting that Fusion may provide better visual output for presentations and client reviews.
  • Reviewers mention that Autodesk Fusion's library features, such as component libraries and categorization, score well at 8.6 and 9.2 respectively, which enhances user experience in managing design elements, while SolidWorks Flow Simulation does not provide comparable scores, indicating a potential gap in library management capabilities.
  • Users say that Autodesk Fusion's product direction is rated positively at 9.1, reflecting a strong commitment to future development and user needs, whereas SolidWorks Flow Simulation's product direction score of 7.1 suggests less confidence in its ongoing evolution and support.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Autodesk Fusion
Autodesk Fusion Manufacturing Extension - Subscription
$1,465.00
1 Subscription Per Year
Browse all 4 pricing plans
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
No pricing available
Free Trial
Autodesk Fusion
Free Trial is available
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
424
8.6
30
Ease of Use
8.6
428
8.3
30
Ease of Setup
8.7
93
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.5
53
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.4
371
8.3
30
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
54
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
420
7.1
28
Features by Category
Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM)Hide 9 FeaturesShow 9 Features
8.6
1,181
Not enough data
CAD to CAM
8.9
143
Not enough data
8.8
131
Not enough data
8.8
138
Not enough data
CNC Programming
8.6
131
Not enough data
8.4
125
Not enough data
8.4
124
Not enough data
Machining
8.5
130
Not enough data
8.7
128
Not enough data
8.7
131
Not enough data
8.6
894
Not enough data
Design
9.0
85
Not enough data
9.2
85
Not enough data
9.0
85
Not enough data
8.6
83
Not enough data
Edit
8.3
83
Not enough data
8.6
81
Not enough data
8.8
81
Not enough data
8.7
76
Not enough data
Collaboration
7.9
75
Not enough data
7.8
81
Not enough data
8.2
79
Not enough data
8.7
247
Not enough data
Library
9.1
24
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
8.4
24
Not enough data
8.6
25
Not enough data
CAD
8.7
24
Not enough data
8.9
28
Not enough data
9.1
28
Not enough data
Integration
8.5
27
Not enough data
8.6
24
Not enough data
8.2
19
Not enough data
8.6
157
Not enough data
Data
8.9
23
Not enough data
8.7
23
Not enough data
8.4
20
Not enough data
8.5
22
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
8.8
22
Not enough data
Logistics
8.5
24
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.9
82
Design
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.8
7
Work
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
8.6
1,337
Not enough data
File Support
9.0
172
Not enough data
8.7
97
Not enough data
8.7
139
Not enough data
File Editing
7.8
140
Not enough data
8.6
168
Not enough data
Software Integrations
7.8
124
Not enough data
9.1
162
Not enough data
Software Type
8.5
168
Not enough data
8.9
167
Not enough data
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
1,042
Not enough data
File Options
9.1
110
Not enough data
8.7
108
Not enough data
8.3
104
Not enough data
9.2
111
Not enough data
7.9
72
Not enough data
8.4
100
Not enough data
Tools
8.3
111
Not enough data
8.8
108
Not enough data
9.2
108
Not enough data
Design
8.8
110
Not enough data
8.5
278
Not enough data
Design
8.5
29
Not enough data
8.4
30
Not enough data
Tools
9.1
33
Not enough data
8.8
32
Not enough data
Library
8.3
30
Not enough data
Platform
8.5
31
Not enough data
8.5
30
Not enough data
Customization
7.8
32
Not enough data
8.2
31
Not enough data
8.4
1,376
8.2
128
Design
9.1
114
8.8
8
8.8
115
8.3
8
9.0
114
7.7
8
8.6
106
7.7
8
Tools
7.2
61
8.1
8
8.4
79
7.7
8
8.1
71
8.1
8
Work
8.0
64
8.3
8
8.1
65
8.5
8
8.3
81
8.3
8
8.3
74
7.7
8
8.2
70
8.5
8
Environment
8.6
95
8.1
8
8.5
85
8.3
8
8.4
82
9.0
8
9.0
100
8.8
8
Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)Hide 18 FeaturesShow 18 Features
8.7
197
Not enough data
Tools - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.5
11
Not enough data
8.5
11
Not enough data
9.3
10
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
File Options - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
9.1
11
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
9.2
11
Not enough data
8.2
11
Not enough data
Customization - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
7.9
11
Not enough data
8.5
11
Not enough data
7.7
11
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
Environment - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.6
11
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
8.5
11
Not enough data
9.2
11
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Autodesk Fusion
Autodesk Fusion
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
Autodesk Fusion and SolidWorks Flow Simulation are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Autodesk Fusion
Autodesk Fusion
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
69.4%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
20.8%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
9.8%
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
48.5%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
27.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
24.2%
Reviewers' Industry
Autodesk Fusion
Autodesk Fusion
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
16.2%
Design
14.3%
Automotive
8.3%
Higher Education
4.8%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
4.0%
Other
52.4%
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
Information Technology and Services
21.2%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
12.1%
Design
12.1%
Higher Education
9.1%
Automotive
9.1%
Other
36.4%
Most Helpful Reviews
Autodesk Fusion
Autodesk Fusion
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Kenny C.
KC
Kenny C.
Verified User in Design

Fusion 360 is a great 3D solid modeler and advanced TSpline surface modeler that offers fantastic usability and performance. The software runs on Mac or Windows which is nice for a mixed environment. Fusion 360 also supports just about any CAD data out...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Jared B.
JB
Jared B.
Verified User in Railroad Manufacture

Parametric modelling has some issues. Mainly the history tree is finicky, things like changing sketches will rename certain lines and arcs (even though all your doing is resizing). This leads to further errors down the design tree. When new lines or arcs...

SolidWorks Flow Simulation
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Military

La facilidad con la que con un modelo ya generado se adapta para iniciar las simulaciones de elementos finitos.

Most Helpful Critical Review
VD
Vrushank D.
Verified User in Automotive

SW FS has given very strange results. Higher camber airfoils have shown to generate less downforce. SW FS also offers little control over mesh generation and options like spinning wheels/moving roads for automotive purposes lead to bad results.

Alternatives
Autodesk Fusion
Autodesk Fusion Alternatives
SOLIDWORKS
SOLIDWORKS
Add SOLIDWORKS
Onshape
Onshape
Add Onshape
Solid Edge
Solid Edge
Add Solid Edge
Creo Parametric
Creo Parametric
Add Creo Parametric
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
SolidWorks Flow Simulation Alternatives
Ansys Fluent
Ansys Fluent
Add Ansys Fluent
COMSOL Multiphysics®
COMSOL Multiphysics®
Add COMSOL Multiphysics®
OpenFOAM
OpenFOAM
Add OpenFOAM
Autodesk CFD
Autodesk CFD
Add Autodesk CFD
Discussions
Autodesk Fusion
Autodesk Fusion Discussions
What do I need to run Fusion 360?
2 comments
Kyler Z.
KZ
If this helps, below is listed what I'm currently running. I have no trouble with my computer not keeping up. The only occasional issue is with a large file...Read more
Does Fusion 360 require cloud credits?
2 comments
Kyler Z.
KZ
I don't find that I need them. I've used some of the credits I have for cloud simulation computing, but it's just as easy to run a simulation using local...Read more
Can I request a demo of Fusion 360?
1 comment
Official Response from Autodesk Fusion
Yes, please call us at: 1-833-843-3437 to schedule a time with a representativeRead more
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
SolidWorks Flow Simulation Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
SolidWorks Flow Simulation has no discussions with answers