Compare Asset Bank and Extensis Portfolio 
- Users report that Extensis Portfolio excels in file types support with a score of 9.1, particularly for images, while Asset Bank follows closely with a score of 9.4, indicating a strong performance in handling various media formats.
- Reviewers mention that Asset Bank outshines Extensis Portfolio in quality of support, scoring 9.4 compared to 8.4, highlighting that users appreciate the responsiveness and helpfulness of Asset Bank's support team.
- G2 users indicate that Asset Bank offers a superior user experience with an ease of use score of 8.9, while Extensis Portfolio lags slightly behind at 8.1, suggesting that Asset Bank's interface is more intuitive for everyday tasks.
- Users on G2 report that Extensis Portfolio has a more challenging setup process, scoring 6.9, whereas Asset Bank's score of 8.0 reflects a smoother onboarding experience, making it easier for teams to get started quickly.
- Reviewers say that Asset Bank's analytics capabilities are rated higher at 9.0, compared to Extensis Portfolio's 8.0, indicating that users find Asset Bank's reporting features more robust and insightful for tracking asset performance.
- Users report that both products have strong file transformation capabilities, but Asset Bank's score of 9.0 suggests it provides more effective tools for converting and optimizing files compared to Extensis Portfolio's score of 8.4.
- Supports all digital file types (image, video, audio, documents, etc.)
- Fully configurable (your branding applied, bespoke metadata, workflows)
- AI auto-tagging
- Organize, search and retrieve all media from one centralized location
- Limit improper usage of files
The relative ease of customization and customer service in that regard
I can't think of anything The setup process and content import can take some time Some customizations I requested required additional development time should be standard, in my opinion Keeping up with maintenance can be challenging, with numbers like this
Portfolio is an easy to use, full featured application that has been around for many years. it is a very good, affordable workgroup solution, and a very good, budget-minded enterprise solution. It has all the basic features you would expect of a DAM...
For libraries and archives, it truly is not robust enough. It is not OAIS compliant nor does it allow for preservation-level metadata (the search becomes slow). We also had a strange time upgrading to 9.5 in which data was probably deleted, we were told...
The relative ease of customization and customer service in that regard
Portfolio is an easy to use, full featured application that has been around for many years. it is a very good, affordable workgroup solution, and a very good, budget-minded enterprise solution. It has all the basic features you would expect of a DAM...
I can't think of anything The setup process and content import can take some time Some customizations I requested required additional development time should be standard, in my opinion Keeping up with maintenance can be challenging, with numbers like this
For libraries and archives, it truly is not robust enough. It is not OAIS compliant nor does it allow for preservation-level metadata (the search becomes slow). We also had a strange time upgrading to 9.5 in which data was probably deleted, we were told...
