Compare ArcGIS 3D Analyst and Matterport 
ArcGIS 3D Analyst vs Matterport
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Matterport easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Matterport overall.
- Reviewers felt that ArcGIS 3D Analyst meets the needs of their business better than Matterport.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Matterport is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of ArcGIS 3D Analyst over Matterport.
Map granularity is incredible and I love the ability to customize no matter what the data source
I wish there was more instruction for new users when creating an account and creating your first project.
Matterport is very easy to use overall. The wide variety of cameras that are compatible with Matterport along with the ability to perform scans with your phone make the software very accessible
1.Not a great opportunity for the "service provider." A service provider's interests are not really aligned with Matterport, since the service provider wants to keep ongoing customers while Matterport is more interested in selling another camera and hosting...
Map granularity is incredible and I love the ability to customize no matter what the data source
Matterport is very easy to use overall. The wide variety of cameras that are compatible with Matterport along with the ability to perform scans with your phone make the software very accessible
I wish there was more instruction for new users when creating an account and creating your first project.
1.Not a great opportunity for the "service provider." A service provider's interests are not really aligned with Matterport, since the service provider wants to keep ongoing customers while Matterport is more interested in selling another camera and hosting...
