Compare Apache OpenMeetings and Jitsi 
- Users report that Apache OpenMeetings offers a solid screen sharing feature with a rating of 8.5, while Jitsi shines slightly brighter with an 8.8, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize seamless visual collaboration.
- Reviewers mention that Jitsi's one-click join feature, rated at 8.8, enhances user experience significantly compared to Apache OpenMeetings, which has a slightly lower rating of 8.7, indicating a smoother entry into meetings.
- G2 users highlight that Jitsi excels in mobile usability with a score of 8.5, while Apache OpenMeetings trails with an 8.3, suggesting that Jitsi may be more suitable for users who frequently join meetings on mobile devices.
- Users on G2 note that both platforms have similar recording capabilities, each rated at 8.1, but Jitsi's overall ease of use (9.0) makes it a more favorable option for users who value straightforward functionality.
- Reviewers mention that Jitsi's hand raising feature is rated at 9.1, which is notably higher than Apache OpenMeetings' 8.0, indicating that Jitsi may provide a more interactive experience during meetings.
- Users say that while both platforms have comparable participant permissions (8.1 for OpenMeetings and 8.5 for Jitsi), Jitsi's higher score suggests a more flexible and user-friendly approach to managing meeting participants.
You could performance the interfaces, work very well and you could install in tour apache server dedicate with a y more software required.
1. It takes time to grab the functionality. 2. It would be great if the team can increase the user experience in terms of more easy navigation or controls.
I can remotely control other devices through an Internet connection. I can make video calls efficiently and encourage communication and problem solving in the company. It is easy to use, the interface is suitable for achieving great things. Its support...
Each time a callers signal falters their screen goes black and when it returns, all callers windows are reconfigured/moved to a new position. Significant echo on the audio front.
You could performance the interfaces, work very well and you could install in tour apache server dedicate with a y more software required.
I can remotely control other devices through an Internet connection. I can make video calls efficiently and encourage communication and problem solving in the company. It is easy to use, the interface is suitable for achieving great things. Its support...
1. It takes time to grab the functionality. 2. It would be great if the team can increase the user experience in terms of more easy navigation or controls.
Each time a callers signal falters their screen goes black and when it returns, all callers windows are reconfigured/moved to a new position. Significant echo on the audio front.
