Compare Apache JMeter and Tricentis Neoload 
- Users report that Apache JMeter excels in stress testing with a score of 9.1, while Tricentis Neoload outperforms with a score of 9.5, indicating that Neoload may provide more robust capabilities for handling high-load scenarios.
- Reviewers mention that JMeter offers good customization options with a score of 9.2, but Neoload shines even brighter with a score of 9.7, suggesting that users may find Neoload's customization features more flexible and user-friendly.
- G2 users highlight that Tricentis Neoload provides superior test feedback, achieving a perfect score of 10.0, whereas JMeter scores 8.3, indicating that Neoload may offer more actionable insights post-testing.
- Users on G2 report that Neoload's reporting capabilities are significantly better, scoring 9.6 compared to JMeter's 8.2, which suggests that Neoload may provide more comprehensive and visually appealing reports.
- Reviewers say that Neoload's automation features are top-notch, scoring a perfect 10.0 in organization, while JMeter scores 8.0, indicating that Neoload may streamline automated testing processes more effectively.
- Users report that Tricentis Neoload is easier to use and set up, with scores of 9.4 for both ease of use and setup, compared to JMeter's scores of 7.8 and 8.6, respectively, suggesting that Neoload may be more accessible for new users.
When using Jmeter,we do not need to programming test scripts.As long as you familiar with the HTTP request, the business process, you can according to the input object in the page to write test cases.What's more,Jmeter's test scripts are easy to maintain,...
not much user friendly as it could be and very less documentation
As compared to JMeter , We found it more easy to record the performance scripts and play back. This tool has a very simple user interface that lets us record and execute the script locally first before we can try it executing in NeoLoad Web portal. We can...
The only thing that I felt was lagging was that the application was too heavy, and there were some compatibility issues with computers having less RAM.
When using Jmeter,we do not need to programming test scripts.As long as you familiar with the HTTP request, the business process, you can according to the input object in the page to write test cases.What's more,Jmeter's test scripts are easy to maintain,...
As compared to JMeter , We found it more easy to record the performance scripts and play back. This tool has a very simple user interface that lets us record and execute the script locally first before we can try it executing in NeoLoad Web portal. We can...
not much user friendly as it could be and very less documentation
The only thing that I felt was lagging was that the application was too heavy, and there were some compatibility issues with computers having less RAM.
