Best Software for 2025 is now live!

Compare Apache JMeter and Locust

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
Star Rating
(156)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.6% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache JMeter
Locust
Locust
Star Rating
(10)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (60.0% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Locust
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Apache JMeter excels in stress testing with a score of 9.1, while Locust, although effective, does not match this level of performance in extreme cases, scoring 8.4. Reviewers mention that JMeter's ability to handle high loads makes it a preferred choice for large-scale testing scenarios.
  • Reviewers mention that Locust shines in ease of use, achieving a score of 9.3 compared to JMeter's 7.8. Users on G2 appreciate Locust's intuitive interface and straightforward setup process, which allows for quicker onboarding and less technical overhead.
  • G2 users highlight JMeter's strong customization capabilities, scoring 9.2, which allows for extensive test configurations and tailored scenarios. In contrast, users report that Locust, while customizable, does not offer the same depth of options, leading to a score of 8.7 in this area.
  • Users say that JMeter's reporting features, with a score of 8.2, provide comprehensive insights into test results, but some reviewers mention that the reporting interface can be less user-friendly compared to Locust's more accessible reporting tools.
  • Reviewers mention that Locust's reliability is impressive, scoring 9.0, which is crucial for continuous testing environments. Users report that JMeter, while reliable, can sometimes struggle under very high loads, leading to performance issues.
  • Users on G2 appreciate the quality of support for Locust, scoring 9.0, indicating that users feel well-supported and have access to helpful resources. In contrast, JMeter's support quality, at 7.5, has been noted by some users as an area needing improvement, particularly in response times and resource availability.
Featured Products
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache JMeter
No pricing available
Locust
No pricing available
Free Trial
Apache JMeter
No trial information available
Locust
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
107
Not enough data
Ease of Use
7.8
107
9.3
5
Ease of Setup
8.6
32
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.5
31
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.5
91
9.0
5
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
29
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.8
102
Not enough data
Features by Category
8.6
227
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
59
Not enough data
8.4
52
Not enough data
8.5
58
Not enough data
Reporting
8.2
58
Not enough data
8.4
70
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
10
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
Automation
8.0
10
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
Locust
Locust
Apache JMeter and Locust are categorized as Load Testing Tools
Unique Categories
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter is categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
Locust
Locust has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
20.8%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
39.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
39.6%
Locust
Locust
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
30.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
60.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
10.0%
Reviewers' Industry
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
Information Technology and Services
36.7%
Computer Software
25.3%
Telecommunications
4.7%
Retail
2.0%
Program Development
2.0%
Other
29.3%
Locust
Locust
Computer Software
50.0%
Retail
20.0%
Financial Services
20.0%
Information Technology and Services
10.0%
Other
0.0%
Most Helpful Reviews
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Shay G.
SG
Shay G.
Verified User in Medical Devices

Already used it for Http, Https, SAP over web, Kerberos, SOAP, SMTP, and other special cases of proprietary protocols, demanding special plug ins. Always accurate and scalable. Always open source and completely free.

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Program Development

During the past, I had problems with the eclipse plugin

Locust
Locust
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Computer Software

Locust has the easiest way I've seen to just load your application and load test it. A simple interface gives different parameters such as number of users and it just runs.

Most Helpful Critical Review
Alternatives
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter Alternatives
SOAPUI
SOAPUI
Add SOAPUI
OpenText LoadRunner Professional
Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional
Add OpenText LoadRunner Professional
Tricentis Neoload
Tricentis Neoload
Add Tricentis Neoload
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
Add BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
Locust
Locust Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
k6
k6
Add k6
SOAPUI
SOAPUI
Add SOAPUI
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud
Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud
Add OpenText LoadRunner Cloud
Discussions
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Apache JMeter has no discussions with answers
Locust
Locust Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Locust has no discussions with answers