Compare Apache JMeter and k6 
- Reviewers mention that Apache JMeter excels in stress testing with a score of 9.1, while k6 shines even brighter with a score of 9.5, indicating that k6 may provide more robust capabilities for simulating high-load scenarios.
- Users report that k6 offers a superior ease of setup with a score of 9.6 compared to JMeter's 8.6, suggesting that k6's streamlined installation process is more user-friendly, making it easier for teams to get started quickly.
- G2 users highlight that k6 has a higher quality of support rating at 9.3 versus JMeter's 7.5, indicating that users may find k6's customer service more responsive and helpful when issues arise.
- Users on G2 mention that JMeter's customization options score 9.2, which is a strong point for users needing tailored testing solutions, while k6's customization features are slightly less emphasized, scoring 8.6.
- Reviewers say that k6's reporting capabilities score 8.6, which is slightly better than JMeter's 8.2, suggesting that k6 may provide more insightful analytics and visualizations for test results.
- Users report that k6 has a perfect product direction score of 10.0, indicating a strong confidence in its future development, while JMeter's score of 7.8 suggests some uncertainty about its ongoing enhancements.
Already used it for Http, Https, SAP over web, Kerberos, SOAP, SMTP, and other special cases of proprietary protocols, demanding special plug ins. Always accurate and scalable. Always open source and completely free.
Need of an adding respective Plugins thru Plugin Manager whenever needed, It would be better if such plugins get added automatically whenever I select any test element or type etc.
K6 lets us test the very critical phases of the application program interface lifecycle with its load and regression testing utilities. They literally have very handy docs which makes the process of setting up the initial setup so smooth. All the examples...
-The user experience of using k6 with npm modules is not consistent with what you expect from typical development -xk6 extensions conceptually are great as a community is helping to build out a need. Just be cautious of utilization as they may not be...
Already used it for Http, Https, SAP over web, Kerberos, SOAP, SMTP, and other special cases of proprietary protocols, demanding special plug ins. Always accurate and scalable. Always open source and completely free.
K6 lets us test the very critical phases of the application program interface lifecycle with its load and regression testing utilities. They literally have very handy docs which makes the process of setting up the initial setup so smooth. All the examples...
Need of an adding respective Plugins thru Plugin Manager whenever needed, It would be better if such plugins get added automatically whenever I select any test element or type etc.
-The user experience of using k6 with npm modules is not consistent with what you expect from typical development -xk6 extensions conceptually are great as a community is helping to build out a need. Just be cautious of utilization as they may not be...
