Compare Apache JMeter and Gatling 
- Users report that Apache JMeter excels in customization with a score of 9.2, allowing for extensive test configurations and tailored scenarios, while Gatling, with a score of 8.0, offers less flexibility in this area.
- Reviewers mention that JMeter's stress testing capabilities are highly rated at 9.1, making it a preferred choice for users needing to simulate high traffic loads, whereas Gatling, scoring 9.0, is slightly behind but still effective for similar tasks.
- G2 users highlight JMeter's superior test variety with a score of 8.7, which supports a wide range of protocols and testing scenarios, while Gatling's score of 8.0 indicates it may not cover as many options.
- Users on G2 report that JMeter's test feedback feature, rated at 8.3, provides detailed insights into test results, which is crucial for performance tuning, whereas Gatling's feedback mechanisms are perceived as less comprehensive.
- Reviewers mention that JMeter's ease of setup is rated at 8.6, making it user-friendly for beginners, while Gatling's score of 7.8 suggests a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Users say that the quality of support for Gatling, rated at 7.9, is often praised for its responsiveness, while JMeter's support, with a score of 7.5, is seen as less reliable, indicating a potential area for improvement.
- Limited free minutes
Already used it for Http, Https, SAP over web, Kerberos, SOAP, SMTP, and other special cases of proprietary protocols, demanding special plug ins. Always accurate and scalable. Always open source and completely free.
Need of an adding respective Plugins thru Plugin Manager whenever needed, It would be better if such plugins get added automatically whenever I select any test element or type etc.
As an open-source performance testing tool, it excels at its intended purpose, particularly by efficiently invoking virtual users without impacting your local computer's resources.
User UI can be improved, lack of more complex examples in the doc
Already used it for Http, Https, SAP over web, Kerberos, SOAP, SMTP, and other special cases of proprietary protocols, demanding special plug ins. Always accurate and scalable. Always open source and completely free.
As an open-source performance testing tool, it excels at its intended purpose, particularly by efficiently invoking virtual users without impacting your local computer's resources.
Need of an adding respective Plugins thru Plugin Manager whenever needed, It would be better if such plugins get added automatically whenever I select any test element or type etc.
User UI can be improved, lack of more complex examples in the doc
