Users report that Ansys HFSS excels in finite element analysis with a score of 9.1, making it a preferred choice for those needing advanced simulation capabilities, while DipTrace, with a score of 8.3 in fluid analysis, is seen as more suitable for simpler tasks.
Reviewers mention that DipTrace offers a more user-friendly experience, scoring 9.0 in ease of use compared to Ansys HFSS's 8.5, which can be a significant factor for small businesses looking for quick onboarding.
G2 users highlight that Ansys HFSS's 3D/solid modeling tools score 7.5, which some users find lacking compared to DipTrace's higher scores in PCB layout editing (8.8) and schematic editor (8.6), indicating a stronger focus on PCB design in DipTrace.
Users on G2 report that both products have similar quality of support, each scoring 8.5, but reviewers mention that Ansys HFSS has a more robust community for troubleshooting complex simulation issues.
Reviewers say that DipTrace shines in component placement with a score of 8.4, which is crucial for efficient PCB design, while Ansys HFSS's lower score in this area suggests it may not be as intuitive for users focused on layout efficiency.
Users say that Ansys HFSS's product direction is rated at 8.3, which indicates a solid roadmap for future enhancements, while DipTrace's higher score of 8.7 suggests a more proactive approach to user feedback and feature requests.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Ansys HFSS
No pricing available
DipTrace
No pricing available
Free Trial
Ansys HFSS
No trial information available
DipTrace
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
32
8.5
35
Ease of Use
8.6
32
9.0
35
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
9.0
5
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.0
5
Quality of Support
8.6
28
8.5
31
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.