When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) overall.
I used S3 at a previous job to supplement the online storage for our clients. We used a SOAP API which worked smoothly. I don't recall any major outages or downtime that adversely affected our clients.
I don't have any dislikes as of now because I've only been with Amazon a few months so I have wait until I have a longer trial of services.
These are NetApp Sweet tools. Replicating data from one NetApp filer to another filer or from one NetApp Cluster to another using their snapshot technology is how NetApp does it backup. Replicating data using snapmirror to a dr site as a solution for...
Very limited and complex process to restore entire Windows Server if the server to crash and need to restore using Backups.
I used S3 at a previous job to supplement the online storage for our clients. We used a SOAP API which worked smoothly. I don't recall any major outages or downtime that adversely affected our clients.
These are NetApp Sweet tools. Replicating data from one NetApp filer to another filer or from one NetApp Cluster to another using their snapshot technology is how NetApp does it backup. Replicating data using snapmirror to a dr site as a solution for...
I don't have any dislikes as of now because I've only been with Amazon a few months so I have wait until I have a longer trial of services.
Very limited and complex process to restore entire Windows Server if the server to crash and need to restore using Backups.