Best Software for 2025 is now live!

Compare Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) and IBM Cloud Object Storage

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
Star Rating
(1,193)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.4% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Browse all 4 pricing plans
IBM Cloud Object Storage
IBM Cloud Object Storage
Star Rating
(27)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (42.3% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about IBM Cloud Object Storage
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Amazon S3 excels in scalability with a score of 9.5, allowing businesses to easily manage growing data needs, while IBM Cloud Object Storage, although capable, received a lower score in this area, indicating potential limitations for rapidly expanding enterprises.
  • Reviewers mention that Amazon S3's versioning feature, rated at 9.0, provides robust data protection and recovery options, which is a significant advantage for users needing to maintain data integrity over time. In contrast, IBM Cloud Object Storage does not highlight versioning as a standout feature, leading to concerns about data management flexibility.
  • G2 users highlight the speed of access for Amazon S3, scoring 9.2, which is crucial for applications requiring quick data retrieval. Users on G2 have noted that IBM Cloud Object Storage, while functional, does not match the same level of performance, potentially impacting user experience in data-intensive applications.
  • Reviewers mention that Amazon S3's encryption capabilities, rated at 9.1, are highly regarded for ensuring data security, with many users appreciating the comprehensive security measures. Conversely, IBM Cloud Object Storage's encryption features received a lower score, suggesting that users may have concerns about data protection.
  • Users say that Amazon S3's ease of use, with a score of 8.7, is frequently praised, making it accessible for teams without extensive technical expertise. In comparison, IBM Cloud Object Storage's ease of use score of 8.0 indicates that some users may face a steeper learning curve.
  • Reviewers mention that Amazon S3's quality of support, rated at 8.7, is often highlighted as a strong point, with many users appreciating the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. In contrast, IBM Cloud Object Storage's support quality score of 8.0 suggests that users may experience less satisfaction with their support interactions.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
No pricing available
IBM Cloud Object Storage
No pricing available
Free Trial
Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
Free Trial is available
IBM Cloud Object Storage
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
896
8.7
18
Ease of Use
8.7
900
8.0
18
Ease of Setup
8.6
446
8.1
8
Ease of Admin
8.6
420
7.5
8
Quality of Support
8.7
818
8.0
16
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.1
405
8.3
7
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
834
8.5
16
Features by Category
Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)Hide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Infrastructure
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Object Storage SolutionsHide 10 FeaturesShow 10 Features
9.1
422
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
44
Not enough data
9.5
42
Not enough data
9.2
44
Not enough data
Reliability
9.0
43
Not enough data
9.5
44
Not enough data
Security
9.1
42
Not enough data
8.5
41
Not enough data
8.9
42
Not enough data
Compatibility
9.1
40
Not enough data
9.0
40
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
IBM Cloud Object Storage
IBM Cloud Object Storage
Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) and IBM Cloud Object Storage are categorized as Object Storage Solutions
Unique Categories
Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) has no unique categories
IBM Cloud Object Storage
IBM Cloud Object Storage is categorized as Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
29.6%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
32.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
38.4%
IBM Cloud Object Storage
IBM Cloud Object Storage
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
42.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
30.8%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
26.9%
Reviewers' Industry
Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
Information Technology and Services
20.6%
Computer Software
18.2%
Financial Services
6.5%
Internet
3.3%
Marketing and Advertising
2.7%
Other
48.7%
IBM Cloud Object Storage
IBM Cloud Object Storage
Information Technology and Services
11.5%
Real Estate
7.7%
Marketing and Advertising
7.7%
Hospital & Health Care
7.7%
Banking
7.7%
Other
57.7%
Most Helpful Reviews
Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
Most Helpful Favorable Review
John H.
JH
John H.
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising

I used S3 at a previous job to supplement the online storage for our clients. We used a SOAP API which worked smoothly. I don't recall any major outages or downtime that adversely affected our clients.

Most Helpful Critical Review
AD
Alex d.
Verified User in Media Production

the fact that it does not integratew out of the box with some protocols

IBM Cloud Object Storage
IBM Cloud Object Storage
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
GM
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising

The foremost thing in the minds of users in a cloud environment is security and IBM helps deliver this alongside its hosting services perfectly. Also having servers to in a cloud environment powered by IBM is very time and cost effective.

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Education Management

I do believe the system could be updated to better reflect the systems needed to utilize the cloud platform

Alternatives
Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) Alternatives
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Add Google Cloud Storage
Akamai Connected Cloud (formerly Linode)
Akamai Connected Cloud (formerly Linode)
Add Akamai Connected Cloud (formerly Linode)
Azure Blob Storage
Azure Blob Storage
Add Azure Blob Storage
DigitalOcean Spaces
DigitalOcean Spaces
Add DigitalOcean Spaces
IBM Cloud Object Storage
IBM Cloud Object Storage Alternatives
Azure Blob Storage
Azure Blob Storage
Add Azure Blob Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Add Google Cloud Storage
IDrive Online and SaaS Backup, Object Storage e2
IDrive Online and SaaS Backup, Object Storage e2
Add IDrive Online and SaaS Backup, Object Storage e2
Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (Amazon VPC)
Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (Amazon VPC)
Add Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (Amazon VPC)
Discussions
Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) Discussions
How are other S3 users solving business problems?
2 comments
Chinh T.
CT
The price is quite expensive Read more
Cost plans
1 comment
Sergio F.
SF
https://aws.amazon.com/s3/pricing/Read more
What type of storage is Amazon s3 used for?
1 comment
Ajay S.
AS
S3 is a object type and highly scalable storage service. We can access the s3 content from anywhere and provides the high availability and high performance.Read more
IBM Cloud Object Storage
IBM Cloud Object Storage Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
IBM Cloud Object Storage has no discussions with answers