Compare Adobe Substance 3D Painter and Mari 
- Users report that Mari excels in its brush variety, scoring 8.7, which allows for a more diverse range of texturing options compared to Adobe Substance 3D Painter, which, while still strong, has a slightly lower score in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Adobe Substance 3D Painter shines in its color capabilities, achieving a score of 9.1, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize vibrant and accurate color representation in their projects.
- G2 users highlight that Mari's texture quality is rated at 8.9, indicating a strong performance in creating detailed textures, while Adobe Substance 3D Painter, although competent, does not match this level of detail.
- Users on G2 report that Mari's dynamic tessellation feature, with a score of 7.4, provides a unique advantage for users needing high-resolution models, whereas Adobe Substance 3D Painter's tessellation capabilities are not as robust.
- Reviewers mention that Adobe Substance 3D Painter has a more user-friendly interface, reflected in its ease of use score of 8.2, which is slightly higher than Mari's score of 8.1, making it more accessible for beginners.
- Users say that the quality of support for Adobe Substance 3D Painter, rated at 8.3, is generally perceived as better than Mari's support, which scored 7.6, indicating a more responsive and helpful customer service experience.
I like the library of preset materials. It makes it really easy to iterate and conceptualize different looks for the same model. Its also super fast
At its core, Substance Painter is clunky. It's very resource-heavy for the average user and can be challenging to work in if the computer's hardware wasn't built for 3D work. Additionally, Adobe's render engine is still terrible. On an average PC or Mac,...
Once you get through the interface and start working with MARI there is no more robust texture toolset on the market. MARI can work with huge texture sizes and multiple UDIMS, putting it into a class leading workflow. The controls are simple and intuitive...
A lot of patience is required, it's not an easy software and requires a lot of time to be understood.
I like the library of preset materials. It makes it really easy to iterate and conceptualize different looks for the same model. Its also super fast
Once you get through the interface and start working with MARI there is no more robust texture toolset on the market. MARI can work with huge texture sizes and multiple UDIMS, putting it into a class leading workflow. The controls are simple and intuitive...
At its core, Substance Painter is clunky. It's very resource-heavy for the average user and can be challenging to work in if the computer's hardware wasn't built for 3D work. Additionally, Adobe's render engine is still terrible. On an average PC or Mac,...
A lot of patience is required, it's not an easy software and requires a lot of time to be understood.
