Compare Abaqus and Ansys Mechanical 
- Users report that Ansys Mechanical excels in finite element analysis with a score of 9.5, while reviewers mention that Abaqus, although strong, scores slightly lower at 8.8. This indicates that Ansys Mechanical may provide more robust tools for complex simulations.
- Reviewers say that Ansys Mechanical's 3D/solid modeling tools are rated at 8.0, which is significantly higher than Abaqus's score of 6.4. This suggests that users find Ansys Mechanical more effective for creating detailed models.
- G2 users highlight that Ansys Mechanical offers superior multibody dynamics capabilities with a score of 9.3, compared to Abaqus's 8.1. This could be a deciding factor for users focused on dynamic simulations.
- Users on G2 mention that Ansys Mechanical has a better ease of use rating at 8.1, while Abaqus lags behind at 7.5. This could indicate that Ansys Mechanical is more user-friendly, making it easier for new users to adopt.
- Reviewers mention that Ansys Mechanical's quality of support is rated at 8.3, slightly higher than Abaqus's 8.1. This suggests that users may have a better experience with customer support when using Ansys Mechanical.
- Users report that Ansys Mechanical shines in command clarity with a score of 8.8, while Abaqus scores 8.6. This indicates that users may find Ansys Mechanical's interface and commands more intuitive, enhancing their overall experience.
Abaqus Contact definitions are the best. Also the material model library is broader than any other software package.
When it compared to other FE programs, it is easy to use toolbars & kits but i need to perform more clicks than other competitors of Abaqus, it is creating timingwise create insufficiency.
The CAD interface is excellent, and meshing is accurate and fast. The geometry selection for load application and boundary conditions is easy to select.
I might have been using an old version (my university might have been cheap), but developing simulations in Ansys was a big pain. There is no "Edit > Undo" option, so if you made a mistake, you had to manually delete and retry. The interface was not user...
Abaqus Contact definitions are the best. Also the material model library is broader than any other software package.
The CAD interface is excellent, and meshing is accurate and fast. The geometry selection for load application and boundary conditions is easy to select.
When it compared to other FE programs, it is easy to use toolbars & kits but i need to perform more clicks than other competitors of Abaqus, it is creating timingwise create insufficiency.
I might have been using an old version (my university might have been cheap), but developing simulations in Ansys was a big pain. There is no "Edit > Undo" option, so if you made a mistake, you had to manually delete and retry. The interface was not user...
