I primarily used the Edge HiveMQ solution. The HTTP interface that can be used to adjust bridge settings made configuration investigation easy. Deployment was simple, because of the JVM. The broker appears to follow MQTT protocol and was easy to integrate into our system. The support channel is quite responsive, and the history of previously asked questions saved me time. For most questions I have, search engines usually discover a high quality HiveMQ article with an answer or tutorial to answer them.

Everything that I need to manage and control devices workflow is available on HiveMQ, especially with IoT device. The visualization control help me to understand and view data easier and see how many connection is the network handling at one time. Real-time monitoring for client session is helpful in protecting devices security and protection from unwanted connection that pose breach/leak to network.

I like the high performance of HiveMQ as an MQTT broker which is necessary for our IoT applications. It can handle a large number of messages effectively, which is crucial for ensuring proper device interaction. The scalability aspect of the software is also a major plus in that we are able to expand our IoT structure without compromising on performance. Our cloud platforms are integrated with HiveMQ to make data handling easier and more accessible. One of the unique options is the possibility to track and control the system with the help of the intuitive dashboard.