Visão Geral de Preços LucidLink
LucidLink em resumo
LucidLink offers two storage options to use with Filespaces.
https://www.lucidlink.com/pricing/
• Provide your own storage - Run LucidLink with your own S3 compliant object storage vendor.
•LucidLink storage - Through a partnership with Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage, LucidLink provides a complete service package for an additional 5 dollars/TB.
Customers are charged based on actual daily usage, metered over each 24-hour period, and invoiced monthly. LucidLinkʼs pricing model takes into consideration two pricing dimensions: the number of connected devices, and the data capacity utilized. As the number of devices and data capacity increases, the cost per terabyte decreases based on predetermined usage tiers.
| Nome | Preço | Recursos |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $7.001 member Por Mês | Colaboração de arquivos sem esforço para pequenos projetos e equipes iniciantes.
|
| Business | $32.001 member Por Mês | Acesso instantâneo a projetos compartilhados de qualquer tamanho para equipes distribuídas.
|
| Enterprise | Plano personalizado para suas necessidades de armazenamento e tamanho da equipe
|
Preços e planos de LucidLink
Principais Alternativas de LucidLink Mais Bem Avaliadas
Avaliações de Preços de LucidLink
Funciona de uma maneira tão integrada com todas as nossas aplicações e mídias - a ponto de você simplesmente esquecer que está proporcionando um fluxo de trabalho em nuvem muito fácil e simples - com todos os benefícios e nenhum dos desafios que essa abordagem tradicionalmente oferece.
Realmente devo mencionar a qualidade do suporte ao cliente - é o melhor suporte de terceiros para qualquer tecnologia que já usei. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
Não há realmente desvantagens. Suponho que o preço seria uma para muitos - mas é muito razoável quando se considera quanto tempo está economizando. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
The original premise of LucidLink was very promising. A CloudNAS that was easy to use and reasonably affordable with powerful features. There wasn't anything like it in the market.
A good sign of a good product idea, is that it didn't take long for copy cats to emerge.
It was a great solution for easily sharing working files between remote team members, usable enough for non-IT specialists both in setup and everyday use. No storage limits, good speeds, pricing reasonable for cloud infrastructure.
Also built a great community and engaged considerably, you felt like a valued customer. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
Unfortunately it didn't last long. This is an infrastructure product, and it needs to be stable and reliable. When you build post production workflows around it, you want it to just work for quite some time.
Before too long there were impactful pricing changes and constant software upgrades. Then there was a massive unprecdented 3 day outage that had global impact on the whole industry. While they worked fast on rebuilding their infrastructure, questions remain on what went wrong.
And recently yet antoher massive software upgrade, this one even more disruptive. New version doesn't have feature parity and pricing became unfavorable. The legacy version was hard to find and felt abandoned, some part of it was disabled under questionable circumstances. Communication was hap-hazard and left the sense of lacking true transparency.
As a longer term customer, it became obvious I was no longer in the market segment they were focusing on, and moved on.
Not an infrastructure provider I would trust. Which is unfortuante. Itstarted well, but went downhill most of the time I used it. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
