O teste pode ser feito em uma vasta coleção, o que basicamente torna mais fácil permanecer em uma plataforma, já que tudo está integrado em um único software. Até mesmo o suporte ao cliente é muito útil. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
O único ponto negativo de usá-lo é o seu preço, que pode ser um problema para um indivíduo. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
Avaliações em Vídeo
2,100 de 2,101 Avaliações Totais para BrowserStack
Sentimento Geral da Revisão para BrowserStack
Entre para ver o sentimento das avaliações.

1. Ampla gama de dispositivos disponíveis para cada categoria, como Android, IOS e Windows, o que o torna uma ferramenta muito útil para realizar testes de compatibilidade entre navegadores, UI e funcionais.
2. Juntamente com uma boa gama de dispositivos, também oferece aos usuários a opção de testar em uma versão específica do sistema operacional para dispositivos disponíveis, o que é muito útil para encontrar bugs específicos de versão em testes de compatibilidade entre navegadores.
3. Uma das melhores características que mais gosto é a mudança de localização: Esta funcionalidade torna o teste de geolocalização muito mais fácil e ajuda a encontrar nossos bugs de casos extremos que tendem a ocorrer em países específicos.
4. Além disso, recursos como ferramentas de desenvolvimento tornam a depuração muito mais fácil quando estamos trabalhando para depurar algo, especialmente em dispositivos móveis.
5. Recursos como controle de velocidade e capacidade de personalizar a resolução para desktops também são muito úteis ao realizar testes de UI e testes de compatibilidade entre navegadores.
6. É uma bênção para os usuários de MacBook, já que podemos facilmente testar nossa tarefa no navegador Internet Explorer usando o BrowserStack. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
1. Às vezes é muito lento: Quando carregamos um dispositivo móvel devido a algum problema, ele fica preso na tela de inicialização e precisamos atualizar a página para que funcione. (Por favor, note: isso acontece apenas às vezes e não é um problema frequente).
2. Mais modelos de diferentes marcas de dispositivos Android precisam ser adicionados - Atualmente, há modelos limitados de dispositivos Android disponíveis, o que leva a um escopo limitado de testes para dispositivos Android. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
Apart from Automation and Manual testing in various devices and Browsers with the help of BrowserStack we can Manage our test cases. Here we can perform bulk operation for addition, deletion etc for test cases. But we can manage our test cases with the help of API. BrowserStack support several APIs to fetch, delete create Projects, Test Cases and so on. Integration of these API is super easy and efficient, this saves a lot of time Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
They should enhance their documentation so that before actually accessing any new feature we can perform a hands on in the documentation only. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

As an android developer i used to test my application in different device and with different screen ratios and different android version. Physically it is not possible to have such number of devices with different Android version.
Browser stack platform is easy to use and test app / website on it.
I use this platform when I have project and if client pays good then i use it frequently to test features.
Actually I didn't imaged that it is much easy to integrate and test.
Personally I didn't need to use customer support because this platform is almost bug-free.
easy implementation curve. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
Charges are bit high for me, but it's worth to test app if client pays good amount. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
The facility to use different browsers on wide range of Desktop OS Browsers, Android Mobile Browsers, iOS Mobile Browsers, Android Tablet Browsers and iOS Tablet Browsers, makes it easy to test on different available viewports and resolutions. The click and load facility is very quick in loading the browser. Advanced features of running automation scripts on BrowserStack make is a go-to choice for Software Testers, as it make is easy to load and run the automation scripts. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
Many times, during the day office hours, when there is heavy traffic, the clicked browser session does not load, or the session all of a sudden gets disconnected. I personally feel, there should be a fully functional Integrated Development Environment ( IDE ) to write code in different programming languages and scripting languages. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

I have been using this for the past 6 months for testing as a SDET intern. I mainly use it for testing our apps on iOS since I own an Android. I haven't explored many options apart from BrowserStack but here are my likes about this software:
1. The UI is quite clean and easy to understand. I learned to use the software within 10 minutes and later on explored more features like changing device location, screen rotation, throttle network, etc. on my own.
2. A lot of integrations like App Center, Firebase, TestFlight, Play Store and App Store are available. You may also upload your own app builds and the supported formats are .ipa , .apk , .aab. My organisation uses .ipa and .apk on a daily basis but I have personally used only .ipa or installed an app by logging in through the App Store in BrowserStack.
3. I run a checklist for one week each month for the vital features in our apps. Since I need to test multiple apps, I install all at once from the App Store and do not have to start separate sessions for each which saves up a lot of my time. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
Although most of my experience with BrowserStack has been exceptionally good, there are a few issues which I have faced and want them to improve on it:
1. I use their software quite frequently and I find the virtual devices getting stuck during testing. This happens about 1 in 10 times and I hope they are working on improving it.
2. Since a large chunk of my company's user base is using 32 bit android devices, which are obsolete, I have to depend on a testing software like BrowserStack to test 32 bit specific features on virtual Android devices. However, I could not find even a single 32 bit Android device on BrowserStack and hence I had to depend on other softwares. I really wish they add support for some 32 bit Android devices as well.
3. Some of the native shortcuts do not work and I hope they add them in the near future. For example, when I try to login to Junglee Rummy app on a virtual iOS device on BrowserStack, I frequently mistype and then I have to press delete repeatedly since BrowserStack does not yet support command + delete or control + delete and hence I am not able to delete the complete number at once. However, other shortcuts like pasting with command + V is supported so I am hoping that they will add the missing shortcuts as well, soon. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

I do not say this about many of the tools I use for my web development but I can say without doubt that BrowserStack is the oldest and most appreciated one of my tools that I cannot live without. The reason is simple - I want to know my code works on multiple clients. There's only so much that emulation does. These guys are geniuses. In fact - it is like having my very own hyper-focused "attention to detail" obsessed colleague. Instead of asking someone to test these pages over and over with each release, BrowserStack will take a screenshot of the page on all the devices I want, and not some emulated device but a REAL mobile or tablet or whatever, running on such a version. It's insane to think of selling a web application as a product without using BrowserStack.
I love:
* the range of devices supported
* the instant availability of devices to screenshot with
* the automation of my testing (unit, integration, functional, etc)
* speed of the devices
* quick to learn
* lots of options and extra value-added Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
I work as a Contractor meaning that I will work on a project for 9 months (as an example) and then might be 2-3 months before a new contract. I can go straight into another project, but the cost is significant enough that I will either cancel my subscription or just delete it.
I would like it if I had a balance that could work with me around this sort of thing - maybe switch to an option where I can run some of the basic tests or have so much credit bought with each payment, and I could scale this back when not using BrowserStack? Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

Been using the App Live feature for a couple of years now.
Under this time the feature has been always available. I don't remember any downtime.
Sessions stability is great and barely faced any issue or disconnection while working on testing apps.
It's pretty straightforward to upload an app and start working, it only takes a few clicks so the usability is good.
In terms of responsiveness, which is something really important when working with real devices, it barely affects user experience and you can work with the app without major delays. I have tested other tools in the market and faced slowness that made it hard to work. This hasn't been the case with BrowserStack.
Also, when support was needed I was always able to reach a representative that ended solving the issue. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
Not a big downside but some documentation hasn't been clear enough or lacks some steps. I was able to solve this by contacting the representatives thru the chat tough. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

I like how it gives you multiple options on different browsers that you can test out different models of phones different just overall the different trials you can perform makes you get a better understanding of the differences between products and browsers software when you're putting a team together to work say like in the mining field like I am a mining prospector it would be good if everybody could easily integrate to the system that you want to use for your company
What do you dislike about BrowserStack?*
Has always because I'm a business owner and I try to save money and make money I wish everything could be free but it can't be so there's not much to dislike
A few things to consider in your review:
Ease of U Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
Has always because I'm a business owner and I try to save money and make money I wish everything could be free but it can't be so there's not much to dislike Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.

BrowserStack é a melhor fazenda de dispositivos em nuvem com mais de 20.000 dispositivos em várias versões de sistemas operacionais. Ele também oferece suporte a dispositivos móveis com SIM, recursos como limitação de rede, interceptação de chamadas de API móveis, comparação de dispositivos duplos e execução paralela para scripts de automação. BS também oferece suporte à maioria dos frameworks de automação para aplicações móveis e web. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
Às vezes, durante os testes em iPhones, os dispositivos travam. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
Browserstack tem muitos recursos sob um mesmo teto. Estou usando Automação de Aplicativos, Automação Web. Adoro seu recurso de teste assistido em Teste de Acessibilidade. Com a ajuda disso, agora posso configurar elementos na página da web para verificar se são acessíveis com teclado ou mouse e, com base nessa configuração, ele executa o teste. Aqui, no Teste de Acessibilidade, podemos usar outros recursos para monitorar nosso site, como Velocidade da Página, Análise, etc. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
Eu não consigo usar um framework muito popular para testes de acessibilidade, que é o Lighthouse em Testes de Acessibilidade, pois não é suportado pelo Browserstack. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.