Comparar QAComplete e Zephyr Enterprise 
QAComplete vs Zephyr Enterprise
- Os revisores sentiram que Zephyr Enterprise atende melhor às necessidades de seus negócios do que QAComplete.
- Ao comparar a qualidade do suporte contínuo do produto, os revisores sentiram que Zephyr Enterprise é a opção preferida.
- Para atualizações de recursos e roadmaps, nossos revisores preferiram a direção do QAComplete em relação ao Zephyr Enterprise.
This tool is highly customizable to suit your company requirements . It contains all the required modules that one should have in a company to manage the testing life cycle from requirements to test reports. It could easily integrate with other bug...
Performance was horrible, and there were numerous issues\defects that we had to contend with. We worked with the SmartBear team for a considerable period to address our issues but were unsuccessful. In fact, the "pain" was so great that we simply abandoned...
Você pode vincular seus defeitos a Histórias. Você pode vincular seus defeitos a Tarefas. Você pode vincular seus defeitos a Requisitos. É realmente fácil criar casos de teste, atualizar esses casos de teste e clonar esses casos de teste. Você pode...
Some of the organization is non-intuitive and buggy. I also think that it could be more user-friendly, perhaps with some pre-made templated test cases (titles giving hints on what to test and possible priorities)
This tool is highly customizable to suit your company requirements . It contains all the required modules that one should have in a company to manage the testing life cycle from requirements to test reports. It could easily integrate with other bug...
Você pode vincular seus defeitos a Histórias. Você pode vincular seus defeitos a Tarefas. Você pode vincular seus defeitos a Requisitos. É realmente fácil criar casos de teste, atualizar esses casos de teste e clonar esses casos de teste. Você pode...
Performance was horrible, and there were numerous issues\defects that we had to contend with. We worked with the SmartBear team for a considerable period to address our issues but were unsuccessful. In fact, the "pain" was so great that we simply abandoned...
Some of the organization is non-intuitive and buggy. I also think that it could be more user-friendly, perhaps with some pre-made templated test cases (titles giving hints on what to test and possible priorities)
