Ao avaliar as duas soluções, os avaliadores consideraram CockroachDB mais fácil de usar, configurar e administrar. No entanto, os avaliadores preferiram fazer negócios com Fauna no geral.
Existem muitos recursos interessantes, como: 1. Opções de escalonamento de cluster ao vivo 2. Particionamento geográfico 3. Alta disponibilidade 4. Opções de backup 5. Arquivamento de dados 6. Implementação de captura de alteração de dados 7. Diferentes...
The cockroach db should have been had a better compatibility with the application loadbalancers as well. Although it is used for the networking loadbalancers it has the downside of not routing on the app layer
The scaling options provided by fauna DB for the given pricing are very insightful and cheap compared to other options available in the market with similar features.
Not available on on-premis where still lots of healthcare and insurance companies are having huge clusters on -premis. Perhaps this can be looked into to acquire more customers.
Existem muitos recursos interessantes, como: 1. Opções de escalonamento de cluster ao vivo 2. Particionamento geográfico 3. Alta disponibilidade 4. Opções de backup 5. Arquivamento de dados 6. Implementação de captura de alteração de dados 7. Diferentes...
The scaling options provided by fauna DB for the given pricing are very insightful and cheap compared to other options available in the market with similar features.
The cockroach db should have been had a better compatibility with the application loadbalancers as well. Although it is used for the networking loadbalancers it has the downside of not routing on the app layer
Not available on on-premis where still lots of healthcare and insurance companies are having huge clusters on -premis. Perhaps this can be looked into to acquire more customers.