Zephyr Enterprise Pros and Cons

The way kt organizes the executions and cycles Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is still no way to export the scripts with steps to an excel or text file Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

You can Link your defects to Stories.

You can Link your defects to Task.

You can Link your defects to Requirements.

It is really easy to Create Test Cases, Update those test cases, and Cloning those test cases.

You can easily Planning the Test Cycle which makes it really useful.

The cloning is not only limited to Test Cases, It allows you to clone the whole test cycle.

Creation of manual test execution is one of the good advantage of Zephyr

Reusability of manual test execution

It allows assigning test cases to release.

A timeline gives an overview about the next test execution.

Other colleagues can provide their feedback by commenting on the test cases. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Test case importing from existing excel sheet is not easy.

Filtering and searching is quiet hectic when you have lots of test cases.

It does not allow to import the test results.

Test Case format can not be customized, it is fixed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Good test case management tools.

It can be integrated with the stories/features you are working on.

It can be linked to bugs found.

The smart back end. the design of the main function of the software is smart and does its job well.

Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Really bad interface. Zephyr should make more of an effort to match the front end to the back end.

Pricing could be better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

we use Zephyr for testing automation ,

we keep track of all of our tests , it is well integrated with Jira Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

pricing ...

i would expect Zephyr would come as part of Jira ,

this is yet another way to charge for every different functionality in the tool - makes it an expensive solution overall. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's OK as basic test case management tool Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Just two types of traceability reports are available:

1.Requirements --> Tests --> Executions --> Defects

2.Defects --> Executions --> Tests --> Requirements Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy to create a test plan and traceability between Task and Stories. Easy to execute test cases and monitor the daily test executions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Every release of their new tool comes with problems that prevents usage for several days. The rollout releases and support could be better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The layout of Zephyr makes it easy for me to view traffic to newer platforms.

Very easy navigation through menu ! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Takes a long time to push this info out to other users, we spend a lot of time putting the info pulled from Zephyr into other software programs (like Slack or email newsletters) - it would be nice if this was all integrated into the same platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Our company has pretty effectively utilized zephyr for running test cases through QA. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The integration with JIRA can be stronger - I would like to create more extensive layers of control within my test cases, which currently isn't supported Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

smart back end. the design of the main function of the software is smart and does its job well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Really bad interface. Zephyr should make more of an effort to match the front end to the back end Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The integration with JIRA is perhaps the best part. It has a pretty intutiive interface that makes QA a breeze and the ticketing system seamless when working between the analytics and development teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

So far, there is nothing to dislike from my end. The product has been the easiest QA tool I have used when compared to the very manual process of using debuggers and manual ticketing that my team and I used before. I'm looking forward to see additional innovations in the future. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.