Zendesk for Customer Service Reviews & Product Details

What I like most about Zendesk is its intuitive ticketing system and centralized customer communication. It makes it easy to manage support requests across multiple channels (email, chat, and web forms) in one place, which improves response time and team collaboration. The automation features, triggers, and macros significantly reduce manual effort and help maintain consistent responses. I also appreciate the reporting and analytics capabilities, which provide clear visibility into support performance and help drive data-based improvements. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While Zendesk is powerful, the pricing can become expensive as your team grows or when adding advanced features. Some useful capabilities are locked behind higher-tier plans, which can make scaling costly. The initial setup and customization can also feel complex, especially for smaller teams without a dedicated admin. Additionally, the reporting configuration sometimes requires extra effort to get very specific insights without using add-ons. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I work as a Dietician & Nutritionist, manage a homeopathy clinic, and also create health education content. I recently started using Zendesk for Customer Service to manage patient support queries and diet plan follow-ups.

What I like most is how easy it is to start using. I did not need any technical setup to begin. I was able to create tickets, reply to patients, and track follow-ups in one place from the first day. Even as a new user, the interface feels simple and clean, so I could understand basic things quickly. Customer care is Quick.

Zendesk helps me keep all patient questions, replies, and follow-ups organized. Earlier, patient queries were coming on WhatsApp and email, and it was hard to track everything. Now I can see the full conversation history in one place. This helps me reply properly and not miss any patient message.

I also like the ticket status system. I can keep a ticket open or pending while waiting for a patient’s reply. This helps me remember which patients need follow-up and which cases are still in progress. Assigning tickets to myself and seeing all open tickets in one list makes daily clinic support work more organized.

The tagging option is useful for my work. I can add tags like diet follow-up or patient query, which helps me quickly understand what the ticket is about. This is helpful when I have multiple patient questions on the same day.

Email support is another feature I find useful. I can manage patient queries coming through email as tickets instead of handling them separately. This saves time and keeps everything in one system.

I also find the overall workflow helpful. Creating a ticket, replying to the patient, adding notes for follow-up, and changing the ticket status makes the support process feel more professional. The number of features is good for small clinic support work, and I do not feel it is too complicated for basic daily use.

I use Zendesk regularly during clinic hours to manage patient questions related to diet plans, follow ups, and general guidance after consultation. Even though I recently started using it, it already helps me keep my support work more structured and organized. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is not much to dislike about Zendesk for Customer Service for my daily clinic support work. As a new user, the interface feels a little busy in the beginning and takes some time to understand. There are many options on the screen, so it can feel slightly confusing at first. Basic setup is easy, but learning all options takes a little time. Apart from this, it works smoothly for managing patient queries and follow ups. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

they answer the phone, their knowledge base is huge. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Zendesk significantly overpromised during the sales process and has failed to deliver on the level of support that was clearly discussed and agreed upon.

From the beginning, I was explicit: I have a large team and require hands-on, ongoing implementation support—not surface-level assistance. This was communicated before signing and reiterated multiple times after onboarding began. Zendesk repeatedly emphasized the size of their team and their ability to support businesses like mine.

In practice, getting meaningful help has been unnecessarily difficult. I emailed three separate Zendesk contacts/teams requesting assistance and received no response. The only reason I finally received a confirmation from someone was because I called again—after already attempting multiple written follow-ups.

When I did eventually get on a Zoom call, I was informed the time would be limited. The session focused on resolving small, isolated issues rather than providing actual setup guidance or walking through a proper implementation. This is not onboarding. This is not hands-on support.

For a platform positioned as enterprise-ready, the lack of ownership, continuity, and responsiveness is unacceptable. The disconnect between what was sold and what is being delivered is stark. Zendesk’s support structure feels reactive, fragmented, and unwilling to engage at the level required for a growing organization with real operational needs.

I chose Zendesk based on explicit assurances of support. Those assurances have not been honored. The experience has been frustrating, inefficient, and deeply disappointing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Zendesk makes handling customer support feel organized and manageable, even when ticket volume is high. Everything emails, chats and customer history is available in one place, which makes responding faster and more consistent. What i like most is how flexible and scalable it is. Automation macros, and clear workflows save a lot of time, and the reporting helps teams understand where improvements are needed. Overall it makes customer service smoother, more efficient and less chaotic for both agents and customer Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Zendesk can feel a bit overwhelming at first because there are so many features and configuration options. It takes time to set up properly and can be confusing for new users. another thing is pricing, many useful features and integrations are locked behind higher plans, which can e tough for smaller teams. also when ticket volume is high the interface can feel slightly cluttered. i Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about Zendesk for customer service is how structured and reliable it is for handling customer issues at scale. When many tickets are coming in from email, chat, or web forms, Zendesk keeps everything organized in one place; nothing gets lost, and every conversation has a clear history. Another thing I really like is how mature and stable the platform feels. It's clearly built for real production use. Once workflows are set up, things run smoothly without constant babysitting. From a backend developer's point of view, the APIs and integration are a big plus. Zendesk works well with internal tools, CRM, and databases. I can sync tickets, users, and events with our backend system without hacks. I also like the automation and triggers. Tickets can be routed, tagged, proportioned, and escalated automatically. This reduces manual work for the support team and keeps response times consistent. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I dislike about Zendesk is that it can become expensive as the team grows. Adding agents and advanced features increases costs quickly, which can be hard for startups or smaller teams. Another downside is that configuration can get complex. Triggers, automations, views, and workflows are powerful, but over time they become difficult to manage if not documented well. The UI, while functional, can feel heavy and slow when handling a large number of tickets. It's not always the fastest experience for agents. Customization also has limits; while Zendesk covers most use cases, very specific workflows sometimes require workarounds or custom apps. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One of the things I like best about Zendesk Support Suite is how intuitive and easy it is to use, even for new team members. The interface is clean and well-organized, which makes it simple to manage multiple conversations across channels like email, chat, and social media all in one place. The ticketing system is especially powerful—it helps us stay on top of customer requests, assign them efficiently, and track their progress without anything slipping through the cracks.

I also appreciate the automation features and macros, which save us a lot of time when handling repetitive tasks or responding to common queries. Plus, the reporting and analytics tools give us valuable insights into our performance, helping us improve our response times and overall customer satisfaction. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While Zendesk Support Suite is a robust and reliable platform, there are a few areas that could be improved. At times, the admin settings can feel a bit complex or unintuitive, especially when setting up advanced workflows or automation rules—it takes some time to fully understand and configure them correctly.

Additionally, the reporting dashboards, while useful, could offer more customization options without needing to upgrade or use external tools like Explore. Occasionally, we've also experienced minor delays or syncing issues when handling high volumes of tickets across multiple channels.

That said, most of these challenges are manageable, and Zendesk regularly updates the platform, so we’re hopeful these areas will continue to improve over time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Zendesk is great because it keeps all customer messages in one place, making it easy to stay organized. And I really like how simple it is to track tickets and reposdone to the customer quickly. I also like the interface; it is clean, which helps my team to stay productive throughout the day without getting confused. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I noticed that the main downside is that some of the advanced settings can be hard to find and take time to learn. Also, if you want to add extra features or more users, the cost can start to get expensive for a smaller business. I also experience that sometimes reporting tools feel a bit limited unless you upgrade. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find Zendesk to be a very convenient tool. It is easy to access, and everything is clearly detailed and well organized. As a customer service representative, I have certain metrics to meet, such as average call handling time. Zendesk simplifies my work because all I need to do is select the appropriate options, choose the title, set the dispositions, and indicate whether a case is pending or solved. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In my experience, I haven't encountered any disadvantages when using the Zendesk tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Its breadth of channels coverage. We have our customer service reps team who communicates to customer on phone, WA , Emails and support tech and internal department on chat too.

Another positive point for us is its integration with multiple products Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It’s not really a dislike, but the high initial cost and the learning curve for a new team could be a deterrent to adoption. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use Zendesk to manage customer escalations by tracking them through tickets. It also facilitates communication between T1 and T2 teams as they handle different cases. I appreciate the ability to create automations and triggers, and I find the macros particularly easy to use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There was a recent update that I didn't particularly enjoy. It seems to have made things within a ticket feel more cluttered, although the features remain useful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.