ReqBin Pros and Cons

ReqBin's most significant advantage is its simplicity. The intuitive design makes it easy for both beginners and experienced developers to send requests and analyze responses without a steep learning curve while also supporting HTTP Methods: ReqBin supports various HTTP methods, including GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH, OPTIONS, and HEAD. This comprehensive support makes it versatile for different API testing scenarios. I find it to be very secure and its speed of response is great. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Those needing advanced features or offline capabilities might need to look at more comprehensive solutions. It lacks some advanced features found in more comprehensive API testing tools like Postman. For instance, it doesn't support automated testing or more complex workflows. I would also love to see a desktop application. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like ReqBin's easy to use UI. I never have to fight with it to do what I want. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

My only complaint with ReqBin is the lack of a dark mod. The interface can be a bit bright especially when doing work late into the night. A browser extension can solve this but it's not ideal. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ReqBin has helped me many times to formulate low-level API request syntaxes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A common dislike I have about ReqBin is that it's statelessness means you often need to re-enter data from previous sessions, or even if you accidentally refresh the page. This causes you to lose work and time, which decreases the ease of use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I was using postman from last many years. It is now in electron and it is consuming too much memory. Reqbin runs in browser and it just need 61 MB. I am now fully moved on this. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It has basic features compare to Postman but still it can work for common testing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ReqBin makes me happy that I can go directly to the browser and can immediately send a test request. Sharing requests with our workmates is also helpful as it simplifies how we work together in developing the API. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

When my testing goes beyond simple requests, the absence of features is a real drawback. It also cannot handle complex scenarios such as authentication flows or multiple-step testing processes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Responsive, easy-to-use, stable. I use it almost every day. Very heplfull for testing API calls and response times Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Doesn't have any painpoints for my needs Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- User-friendly UI

- Share / reproduce API requests

- Web version

_ Super cheap pricing Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- Not as extensive as other programs like Postman, but this is not necessarily as they have different use cases. I seriously can't find any gripes with the software! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The most thing i have liked about Rqebin is the UI ,its mostly friendly based UI and we can navigate easily via left home panel and it is some what better response Ui also Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The disliked thing is its slowness ,Sometimes we will feel slowness while fetching response from requests Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy online interface for API testing with GET, PUT, POST, PATCH requests.

Code generation.

Online code runner for python and php. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing to dislike. Everything works as expected. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

No desktop app is needed. It can be directly used from browser. Request timing can be seen in detailed way. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Found few ads. It would be better if ads are disabled. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.