50 Polarion Reviews
Overall Review Sentiment for Polarion
Log in to view review sentiment.
From all the presentations I have seen at RealizeLive it seems as the best tool. In fact, at my company Epiroc we have started looking into getting Polarion for our R&D business. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
As of now I have not seen any disadvantages. Looks like when users are having need for fixes or new features, Siemens will meet the needs and provide improvements. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Polarion is very flexible and end-user friendly. You can configure it to your needs and build it up so that it is scalable. Due to it's complexibility it can be used to connect the whole develpment process and make it transparent and tracable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The administration (in the backend) is a bit tricky and not as "user"-friendly as the UI for the end-user. To build it up from the scratch it would be helpful to have e.g a few decision charts connectet to solutions or best practice, because the first base and infrastructure is essential. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The usability given by Polarion.
The flexibility given by Polarion.
The customisation options provided by Polarion. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It does not support containerisation i.e., we cannot deploy Polarion as a container and we cannot use Kubernetes as well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It far better in comparsion to JIRA in maintaing the Software requirements and executing project documentation Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
saved query for custom purpose is alawys hard to define Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
You can cover your whole devops process but also Single steps with Connection to your other process Applications Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The Polarion License Model is complicated Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Easy to use and user friendly.
Many options to customize based on our need.
One solution for all your needs into Product development. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Variant Management not so good to use due ti lack of understanding Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Simple user experience on a web based approach. Strong functionalities for requirements management. Flexibility, possibility to adapt the tool to our process and data model Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Few limitations on the test part. Document generation can be improved. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
the flexibility, the user interface, variaty of options and possibilitys of customization Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
a lot of insights you need to know for the admin part, not that intuitive but very complex. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I like the simple connection with other corporate ALM tools that use requirements data. This makes it simple to expand into Polarion's Test Management solution or other out-of-the-box extensions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
In Polarion REQUIREMENTS, the ordering of requirements is typically based on their position in the hierarchy. However, if you are missing the ordering case structure, you may want to consider manually reordering the requirements in the hierarchy. To do this, you can simply drag and drop requirements within the hierarchy to the desired position, but this process is a bit time-consuming. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The UI is fairly intuitive after some training. We are able to extend the behavior using scripts. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Performance is slow on large documents. this has to be fixed to help extend usage Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
