The review feature of tracking changes and adding review comments is the best environment I have liked to use in the peer review process. That supports multi-author collaboration, allowing them to see edits, and at the same time accept or reject the changes with a note as feedback or a suggestion to the editor user. The editing of a common document by multiple hands is possible without leaving the original content. The sharing of a piece of a document and folders through OneDrive or SharePoint is possible now. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I found that the speed issue when working in real-time on long/heavy documents, especially those having numerous templated styles, as well as predefined form fields and new content controls, including macros. This led to formatting and refreshing issues when working with complex layouts and rich media content. The fear of losing the expected outcome due to formatting inconsistencies. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.





