Loopio Pros and Cons

Our team is excited that all project content is housed together and rated according to success and usage. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Small neauances that could be clearer. For example, when you set up a review, its a very manual process to make sure each one has a second approver or reviewer assigned. I wish there was a way to add attachments outside of a past project. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We see the content library as the primary benefit of Loopio to our organization. We spent a great deal of time during our old RFP process just searching multiple documents for appropriate boilerplate language to use to be responsive. With the Loopio content library, we expect to be able to streamline that process by using Magic to search our content for us and populate answers so that we can personalize and tailor the proposals and add "connective tissue," but we don't have to spend time searching for boilerplate.

Additionally, we have created custom sales proposal templates that have streamlined our ability to get proposals to our sales team in 15 minutes or less. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is nothing we dislike about Loopio. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We like being able to organize our data into stacks which is use for our different products. The system is so easy to use with functionality that is extremely useful to our company. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We really don't have complaints about the product. The product has a very strong search engine and we can streamline our responses because of our use of Loopio! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that Loopio is bringing AI into their library and helps our company streamline our time to push out great work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It does take a while to learn the process of everything, but once understood, it will help our team tremendously. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Loopio is a great tool that helps my team stay organized and involved in our projects. As a newer member of the team, Loopio has been a huge aid in my training and I love how through the training resources are for the application. The Library saves us so much time on new projects, and as a new team member I have a detailed, organized database at my fingertips. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes importing and exporting is not quite seamless in terms of formatting. I don't always get notified when SMEs leave comments on questions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is very easy to use and they continue to improve on and add functionality. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The context search isn't always very accurate. Sometimes filtering through content after running magic can take a little while for this reason. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love how the search bar works. It always populates with the most relevant info and the filters are so helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I currently do not have any downsides to Loopio. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The search functionality is very easy to use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is nothing that I dislike about this offering, Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Loopio is easy to use, enables greater team collaboration, and ensures that we deliver our best RFPs each time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Loopio has been a great product for us. We do not have any issues currently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We've been using Loopio for a handful of years now and it has been a game changer for managing the RFP process. The ability to manage a library of pre-approved questions and answers has been helpful for both email writing and RFPs. The library review checkpoints are a great way to ensure that the library only contains the most up-to-date information. Our sales team really enjoys using Loopio to manage RFPs and collaborate on answers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some processes are a bit less user friendly, particularly when it comes to working on RFPs with a team. On a single question, you can assign someone to complete it, someone to review it and then you can submit an answer to be reviewed/added to the library. It can be confusing to manage this process of operations. Also, I don't find the Magic tool to be great, however it works better when you look at each question one-by-one. I also recognize that our library is not organized well and contains a lot of dupicate information that should be tidied up, so this likely contributes to the performance of the Magic function. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.