LambdaTest Reviews & Product Details - Page 16

the seamless ui is one thing i liked the most.

The presence of all email clients helped me see my changes which would both support legacy devices and new ones Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As such have been using it for about 2 months a little improvement on ui reloads would be great. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Being cloud-based, LambdaTest allows you to scale testing efforts easily, making it ideal for teams that need flexibility in their testing capacity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For smaller teams or limited budgets, the pricing can feel a bit high, especially if you require more parallel testing sessions or need access to a broader range of devices and browsers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What stands out most about lambda test is its comprehensive cross browser and cross device testing capabilities.The ability to quickly switch between different browser and operating systems.Easy to help with Customer support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The flexibility helps catch issues that might appear on specific browser os combinations that are otherwise hard to access. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1) very easy to understand and use.

2) It is reliable and efficient

3) Easy integration with continous integration tools like jenkins

4) Multiple automation tool support - ex selenium, playwright etc

5) great for cross browser testing Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Not a lot. Some times application is little slow . Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

-User and see eecution Atomation execution results in video format. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- We faced many timeout issues while test eeeecutios Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Real Device Cloud: Access to a vast range of real devices for accurate testing that mirrors real-world user experiences.

Parallel Testing: A game-changer for reducing testing time by enabling simultaneous testing across multiple devices and browsers.

Automated Testing: Seamless support for Selenium and Appium frameworks makes automation efficient and hassle-free. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Cost: Some users may find the pricing plans to be relatively high, especially for smaller teams or individual developers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Lambda test provides easy interface where I can add my test apk and start any device of my choice. Its like an emulator but better, since I am able to see all the various interactions of the app from the backend service. Every thing is logged in the network tab and the curl can be copied with a single click.

As a backend dev its tough for me to reachout to front end folks to ask what apis are being called from various components of the app. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The app crashes frequently and the device also restarts in middle of testing and tab switch from logs to network logs.

Everytime a new device boots up. I would want personalized experience where my session data is persisted on the device and I can continue form there. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are ton of things that i liked about LamdaTest: such as Web Automation, Real Device Testing and alot! It's very easy to use and get handy with the implementation.

I use LambdaTest reguraly now a days! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Well the free tier has every thing except the session duration in free tier should be increased. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One of the standout features of LambdaTest is its comprehensive approach to website testing and automation. Its ability to compare screenshots with baseline images ensures that any changes made to the website can be quickly identified, allowing for efficient debugging and maintenance.

Additionally, LambdaTest's cloud-based platform for testing on real devices is highly convenient, eliminating the need for businesses to invest in physical devices. This not only saves costs but also provides access to a wide range of browsers, viewports, and devices, ensuring thorough testing across various platforms.

Overall, LambdaTest's combination of automated testing, screenshot comparison, and real device testing streamlines the entire testing process, enhancing productivity and reliability for developers and businesses alike.

Quick customer support enhances user experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Fragmented pricing tiers complicate access to essential features, potentially leading to higher costs and user frustration.

LambdaTest's configuration process can be challenging, compounded by documentation that may not sufficiently clarify usage. Improved documentation could enhance user experience, ensuring easier comprehension and smoother utilization of the platform's capabilities, thereby mitigating potential frustrations during setup and initial usage. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Customer support is excellent; whenever I needed assistance, they were prompt and helped me quickly.

The tool is very good, simple.

I would like to have more apps available for Android 7 versions besides the ones already provided, but it already helps a lot with the newer versions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recently, I had an issue with the configuration of capabilities when sending the .apk via API, where in my pipeline it used to work before but now started presenting an issue of:

ERROR webdriver: Request failed with status 500 due to WebDriver Error: [INVALID_APP_ID] The app_id lt://APP10160582261717596065235980 specified in the ‘app’ params is invalid. Please specify a valid app_id that was returned in the response to upload app API request and try again. [0-0] 2024-06-05T15:19:10.108Z ERROR webdriver: WebDriver Error: [INVALID_APP_ID] The app_id lt://APP10160582261717596065235980 specified in the ‘app’ params is invalid. Please specify a valid app_id that was returned in the response to upload app API request and try again.

This message was not previously displayed in my pipeline. After some time, it started appearing, and through chat conversation, I discovered it was because of an APK visibility parameter.

I would like to recommend, if possible, to improve the returned message in the log above to inform the user that besides the app_id being invalid, they should also check the visibility of the application sent via API to see if it's set as "team" for pipeline executions.

This change would have saved me a lot of time.

Thank you in advance :) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.